Because the others are warped in the raw numbers

what

That's not true

not the broad correlation

If you can REPLICATE the same findings OVER AND OVER AND OVER

using the same methods

mind you

It's especially damning if we use DIFFERENT methods

which they havent

my point exactly

???

you just said it

The sexual harassment research shows VERY strong similarities to the rape research

And both keep replicating their results

thats not what i meant

I meant that the rape and sexual harresment is defined differently in each country

I know

That is irrelevant, because we can account for that

The correlation remains equally strong either way

You can but it is not the best thing that you could do

All im saying is different methods are required then its undeniable. Currently it is only damning

Ok, let me explain something to you

Policies are made on about 1000 times less evidence than this

I dont hold policies in any high regard because all of them are shit

Good, so we both agree on that

I hold statistics to high regard

But

And here's the but

Do you agree we have to play the game of politics because we can't escape it?

Yes

Good, then lets play it

But that does not stop a better study from being conducted

I agree, but we should still use the past research on this

Of course

This is not misleading people

This is showing them the truth

I guess I might have used a stronger word than was necessary.

Well I mean

The complete opposite of the truth, that's pretty strong

Well truth is in the eye of the beholder

There's one singular objective truth, but there are many ways to make improvements in the world