Message from @Nathan James 123

Discord ID: 639808283821211689


2019-11-01 12:46:49 UTC  

I do not know how good of a pick he is, but it's utterly moronic to measure him by how well he knows particulars of somehting that will be done by his underlings, instead of how good he's at actually managing people.

2019-11-01 12:46:51 UTC  

And saying you need a science degree to manage people is silly

2019-11-01 12:47:06 UTC  

Compared to having someone with a degree in nuclear physics? @leavethisbotnet

2019-11-01 12:47:08 UTC  

He also does have a degree in science

2019-11-01 12:47:09 UTC  

I'd imagine, quite bad.

2019-11-01 12:47:17 UTC  

""""science""""

2019-11-01 12:47:25 UTC  

Are you going to start telling me that gender studies is a science next?

2019-11-01 12:47:26 UTC  

KEK

2019-11-01 12:47:41 UTC  

"Well actually! It's a science if you think about it!"

2019-11-01 12:47:45 UTC  

If that guy with a degree in nuclear physics is some turboautist, he'd be an absolutely terrible pick, no matter how good he is at science.

2019-11-01 12:47:48 UTC  

To get an animal husbandry degree, you have to take all the precursor science classes, like biology and physics

2019-11-01 12:48:06 UTC  

besides being a nuclear scientist is not the same as being a social engineer

2019-11-01 12:48:20 UTC  

So, an undergrad qualification before he can go onto do his degree

2019-11-01 12:48:21 UTC  

<:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

2019-11-01 12:48:28 UTC  

Compared to a PhD scientist?

2019-11-01 12:48:31 UTC  

Yeah man, great pick!

2019-11-01 12:48:45 UTC  

Having a degree in nuclear physics is not the same as running the whole energy grid

2019-11-01 12:48:55 UTC  

in fact, you need a broad range of knowledge in a lot of things

2019-11-01 12:49:03 UTC  

Like, you'd need to know about coal, nuclear power and so on

2019-11-01 12:49:20 UTC  

being highly specialized in one thing is a mistake, you need to be generally good at a lot of things to be good in that and be able to manage people

2019-11-01 12:49:41 UTC  

"G-Guys! It's not the same!"

2019-11-01 12:49:45 UTC  

Yeah, lets have someone who studied _science_ manage _people_. Great idea. It may be completely outside of his field, but I'm sure that will always work out.

2019-11-01 12:49:58 UTC  

"H-He might actually be good with his useless degree!"

2019-11-01 12:50:26 UTC  

His degree is a science degree, he didn't only learn about animals

2019-11-01 12:50:33 UTC  

you need a lot of other information on physics to get it

2019-11-01 12:50:42 UTC  

The same basic physics degree is also there to become a nuclear scientist xD

2019-11-01 12:51:04 UTC  

You get a basic science degree then specialize in your field

2019-11-01 12:51:20 UTC  

So yeah, it's not as if the general knowledge on the energy grid changes

2019-11-01 12:51:42 UTC  

And in fact, you'd need to know a lot about architecture and engineering to understand how the energy grid works

2019-11-01 12:52:10 UTC  

Go on, do tell that he is actually a "scientist" and that his pick was fine!

2019-11-01 12:52:18 UTC  

there's really nothing about this that ends up in a science degree, learning how to run the power grid is kind of it's own thing

2019-11-01 12:52:24 UTC  

His pick was fine

2019-11-01 12:52:31 UTC  

"W-W-Well, he had to study physics in highschool!"

2019-11-01 12:52:35 UTC  

"He did some science!"

2019-11-01 12:52:40 UTC  

Anyone decent at managing people could run it, and he knows generally enough about science to fit in the role

2019-11-01 12:52:53 UTC  

it's not that technically sophisticated, it's very broad information on a lot of subjects that matter

2019-11-01 12:53:00 UTC  

He actually studied physics in college lol

2019-11-01 12:53:03 UTC  

And got a degree

2019-11-01 12:53:09 UTC  

"And got a degree"

2019-11-01 12:53:19 UTC  

A degree in animal husbandry <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

2019-11-01 12:53:25 UTC  

<:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586> <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>