Message from @SmolBoiPoncho
Discord ID: 643055711458295819
Old source, try again
Richard Spencer would love that graph~
No it says on the paper “from 1400 to 1950”
That’s enough historical data to make a damn good case
https://animeright.news/ Didnt know this was a thing but I love it
Only reliable news source
Well time to throw out those inhalers and when it gets difficult to breath? Close your eyes... Think of Greta~
lol
Jesus, that chart doesn't use formal language, so... where does it come from?
Not a journal, that's for sure.
In journals you don't find "don't." You do find "do(es) not."
I'd really be skeptical about the validity of the writer of that "paper" if they use informal language in a formal manner. That isn't nitpicking, that's the whole basis of peer review, and vetting. A researcher can offer good evidence, but be disregarded due to how they offered it. Does it mean their evidence is magically gone? No, but it isn't accepted by peer review, therefore it might as well not exist.
Given it was a random screenshot that's informal, it's probably hella bullshit.
Also, teachers unions: They're awful. The wider the range, the worse it is, the same with any union. From the customer side it's bad because the teacher is basically strong-armed tenure, and benefits, such as being able to be transferred if need be. This results in the possibility of a teacher being able to just not do their job. There's no incentive, they have reached the top of their career.
For a teacher: This is bad, because the wide range means yes, more contracts, but less contracts in areas you actually want to work in/live in for the same amount of pay. I'm no economics expert, but that sounds really fucking shitty.
For the countries under the union: That's bad, teachers being shuffled around that might not know the language that well, teachers that are paid too much and can't be fired, teachers that don't even have to do their job properly. Lower quality of education for more money. It's a sponge of tax dollars.
Oh, and with unions comes strikes. What do you do if you take action against a teacher not doing their job properly? They all can decide to not do their job. Doesn't that sound great?
Fucking retarded EU shill, don't talk about the education system when you know jack shit about it. You limp pencil dick.
With the US, education heavily differs by state with regards to what is funded and what is not. A few good examples would be Arizona, which is constantly on the bottom rung of education in the US despite getting relatively large amount of funding that consistently gets funneled into school sports programs. Another good example is California, the state of "funnel money into it to solve all problems" but currently has the lowest high school graduation rate of any state. It's not funding that is the issue, it's the improper allocation of funds. Also, unions (at least from what I've seen in the US) that are based in the service industry (ie Education, Journalism, etc.) as opposed to the labor industry tend to have very pervasive communist roots that clash with the constitution (very good recent example is the Red For Ed movement).
How do you not realise that people can still be fired for NOT doing their job. Most teachers are doing MORE than their job requires, such as spending their own money on supplies because your awful country doesn’t know how to manage money.
Actually the increased contracts has allowed teachers to move into more fields, if they so choose. Which is good for the students and the teachers, since the teacher wants to be in that field. Further, teachers being paid more is a good thing, as it results in a higher quality of education. As shown in this paper, unionisation results in a higher standard of education:
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6899835.pdf
We already know that higher pay generally equals better employees, whom will work harder. Why don’t you want better teachers?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2016/07/21/think-teachers-cant-be-fired-because-of-unions-surprising-results-from-new-study/
This article which is citing a published paper states the opposite, that highly unionised districts actually fire more bad teachers. Those with tenure can still be fired, depending on the severity of their issue, with or without union support.
Yes, strikes can happen; but they generally only happen in the most serious of cases as that is the unions last resort. There’s only so-long that the union can strike as well, due to funding; so they’re limited in that regard.
So we have unions firing more bad teachers, unions negotiating better wages for their staff which results in a higher quality of education at the end. Sorry little guy, facts don’t care about your feelings. Teachers unions are beneficial to both the student and the teacher; the only two parties that matter. Funny how you talk about me not knowing the education system, yet some simple fact checking and you could have found all of this out. Try harder next time little guy @Ethaneth.
Get your facts right before you poorly start trying to insult people and make yourself look like an even bigger idiot online 🤷
@braxtonkai is Tariq taking the MAGA Pill?
Why did you delete your twitter account? @Omar_The_OMAP
Shut Up, Weez
Alright /r/The_Donald poster 🤣
Shut up, Weez
Good luck getting the role next time man
Shut up, Weez
I’m sure it was just experience issues. Get some more and keep trying
Are you still in that group? Khaos I think it’s called?
Doxing what?
This isn't public shit
What isn’t?
I spoke to Twipz lmao
When they bring cross-play, I’m joining
They won't take you, lmao
What's your GT
True to be fair. I stopped playing just before the new dlc came out
On PC. They’re bringing cross-play eventually