Message from @JoeyJoestar1337
Discord ID: 646139245215612968
That too
The Republican party needs a natural transition.
We need a party name BM, bowel movement
Lol
I haven't watched LwC or Ben Shapiro in so long
Unironically
I watch them if it's a topic I care enough about, they have well thought out opinions and it's worth hearing it sometimes
It's so bad though
Crowder will wear a walther tshirt and have Dan Crenshaw, who's John McCain 2.0, and soft ball all questions at him regarding the taps act and all the red flag laws and stuff and practically agree with him Dave Rubin style.
No pressings or anything
fr...
steven is blackpilling
when the one who champions not being afraid to speak... is afraid to speak.
It doesn't have to be to blackpilled
Movement is still going n it's not the apocalypse till God says so
But there's people to watch that aren't richard Spencer spergs and aren't boomer media of LwC and Ben Shapio standards
I watch NOTHING on blaze TV or whatever
That also aren't fence sitters like tim pool lol
Well Walther is their sponsor. Am I the only one who remembers radio programs having sponsors? And I'm not sure what you are mad at Crenshaw about TAPS is not a red-flag law it just sets up a committee to so threat assessment. The only thing on firearms I could find in the bill was 8-b where it says TAPS cannot spend funds to train people in firearms use. I'll link the bill;
https://babin.house.gov/uploadedfiles/babin_068_xml.pdf
Rule 1 if you have to link 1 hour of videos to make a point you do not have a point.
Not even making a point I was just sending content I've seen for people to watch if they want that I think they'd really enjoy that's a breath of fresh air.
Yeah I sent the full text of the bill you were calling a red flag law. Which it clearly is not.
It looks to me (you know from reading the bill rather than listening to some woke YTer) that they are responding to the cries that we should 'do something'
About school shootings. So they produced a 'something' that has no ellement of restricting gun rights.
"Threat Assessment Prevention and Safety"
Almost as though Groypers seize on non-issues because it excites their dopamine receptors. Did you read the bill? Or are you just excited about the title?
I mean it's like when people got upset about the CDC studying gun violence. The last time they did that they found millions of defensive firearms uses.
Are you even in favor of the bill boomer?
I'm ambivalent. Merely pointing out that people are willing to spend hours calling it a red flag law without ever reading it.
> So they produced a 'something' that has no ellement of restricting gun rights.
It doesn't matter, it has the illusion of doing *something*, as you said. @Jym
Well we can agree that you are punching at illusions. And spending a lot of energy on it. I prefer to deal with reality but I am sure it is emotionally fulfilling....
Just smile and nod along with them. Let them push their empty solutions
Boomer summarize the taps act for me instead of sending me the pdf to read if you know it so much if the concept of it is so simple to you.
I'm not sure it is empty. But I must note at this time that while you tacitly acknowledge it is not a red flag law you are more not less excited about opposing it.
I don't achnowledge anything I'll get to that in a moment
Oh sorry summarize? Sure I mean I did skim it but basically it sets up a small taskforce with a small budget to analyze the small problem of mass shootings. With a lot of restrictions and legalese. But I could not find anything in the bill empowering anyone to take anyone's firearms.
I mean you could read it and prove me wrong *I* couldn't find anything like that.