Message from @UnScottable
Discord ID: 646132178580799497
They should change parties in protest
If they still on principle disagree with republican policies. Then they shouldn't switch, it'll only damage the republicans
They don't have to change to R's
Who else? It's America. Our party system doesn't work like that unfortunately
They could recreate the bull moose party
Just vote in line with Republicans.
Ah yes
Get stuff done.
That too
The Republican party needs a natural transition.
We need a party name BM, bowel movement
Lol
I haven't watched LwC or Ben Shapiro in so long
Unironically
I watch them if it's a topic I care enough about, they have well thought out opinions and it's worth hearing it sometimes
It's so bad though
Crowder will wear a walther tshirt and have Dan Crenshaw, who's John McCain 2.0, and soft ball all questions at him regarding the taps act and all the red flag laws and stuff and practically agree with him Dave Rubin style.
No pressings or anything
fr...
steven is blackpilling
It doesn't have to be to blackpilled
Movement is still going n it's not the apocalypse till God says so
But there's people to watch that aren't richard Spencer spergs and aren't boomer media of LwC and Ben Shapio standards
I watch NOTHING on blaze TV or whatever
That also aren't fence sitters like tim pool lol
Nick Fuentes is pretty good, these guys are too.
Well Walther is their sponsor. Am I the only one who remembers radio programs having sponsors? And I'm not sure what you are mad at Crenshaw about TAPS is not a red-flag law it just sets up a committee to so threat assessment. The only thing on firearms I could find in the bill was 8-b where it says TAPS cannot spend funds to train people in firearms use. I'll link the bill;
https://babin.house.gov/uploadedfiles/babin_068_xml.pdf
Rule 1 if you have to link 1 hour of videos to make a point you do not have a point.
Not even making a point I was just sending content I've seen for people to watch if they want that I think they'd really enjoy that's a breath of fresh air.
Yeah I sent the full text of the bill you were calling a red flag law. Which it clearly is not.
It looks to me (you know from reading the bill rather than listening to some woke YTer) that they are responding to the cries that we should 'do something'
About school shootings. So they produced a 'something' that has no ellement of restricting gun rights.
"Threat Assessment Prevention and Safety"
Almost as though Groypers seize on non-issues because it excites their dopamine receptors. Did you read the bill? Or are you just excited about the title?
I mean it's like when people got upset about the CDC studying gun violence. The last time they did that they found millions of defensive firearms uses.
Are you even in favor of the bill boomer?
I'm ambivalent. Merely pointing out that people are willing to spend hours calling it a red flag law without ever reading it.