Message from @Nathan James 123

Discord ID: 643872765123756032


2019-11-12 17:55:11 UTC  

Fuck, now that is CHEAP

2019-11-12 17:55:13 UTC  

literally some kid could do it

2019-11-12 17:55:28 UTC  

~~It's literally that easy to do~~ @Cragnathar The Destroyer

2019-11-12 17:55:29 UTC  

🙂

2019-11-12 17:56:44 UTC  

It's very easy to build a botnet

2019-11-12 17:56:52 UTC  

There are free tools online to do it

2019-11-12 17:57:24 UTC  

If you want a low-powered one you can google "purchase network stress tester"

2019-11-12 17:58:00 UTC  

They're more than enough to use against an individual

2019-11-12 17:58:07 UTC  

*Don't use them on people, unless you have permission.*

2019-11-12 17:58:16 UTC  

*Don't use them on anything, unless you have permission.*

2019-11-12 17:58:26 UTC  

*Make sure that you have written and signed permission before you do anything.*

2019-11-12 17:58:33 UTC  

*Do not break the law.*

2019-11-12 17:59:07 UTC  

i used to think of a botnet generally as a bunch of computers that had been infected by malware bringing them under some central control

2019-11-12 17:59:14 UTC  

guessing it's a bit more complex than that nowdays

2019-11-12 17:59:17 UTC  

Yep, that's generally it

2019-11-12 17:59:30 UTC  

The only real thing that has changed, is the way that they are controlled

2019-11-12 17:59:32 UTC  

or rather, not the only way to do it

2019-11-12 17:59:36 UTC  

hmm

2019-11-12 17:59:47 UTC  

And the devices that are infected

2019-11-12 18:00:19 UTC  

You know those nice shiny IoT devices? Your little smart fridge, your smart TV, Smart light, etc. They're all running linux and they're all servers with no protection on them

2019-11-12 18:00:29 UTC  

They are the targets now

2019-11-12 18:00:32 UTC  

yeah

2019-11-12 18:00:56 UTC  

So rather than setting up a botnet in a university with a big connection and lots of PCs, they will target "smart homes", those idiots with lots of unprotected IoT devices.

2019-11-12 18:00:59 UTC  

your lightbulb is bringing down the labour party <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

2019-11-12 18:01:07 UTC  

Unironically

2019-11-12 18:01:07 UTC  

KEK

2019-11-12 18:01:25 UTC  

> The party said it had successfully foiled what appeared to be an attempt to steal data. The incident was reported to the National Cyber Security Centre but Labour said it believed that all of its systems withstood the attack without a breach.
> “We have experienced a sophisticated and large-scale cyber attack on Labour digital platforms,” a party spokeswoman said. “We took swift action and these attempts failed due to our robust security systems. The integrity of all our platforms was maintained and we are confident that no data breach occurred.

so which is it: a ddos or a hacking attempt.. or both

2019-11-12 18:01:53 UTC  

Probably both

2019-11-12 18:01:59 UTC  

DDOS acts as a distraction

2019-11-12 18:02:12 UTC  

*IF* there was a hacking attempt, then that would be done behind the DDOS attack

2019-11-12 18:02:15 UTC  

While the techs are busy

2019-11-12 18:02:28 UTC  

An "attempt to steal data" could literally be anything

2019-11-12 18:02:43 UTC  

It could be as simple as someone trying to sign into the Labour member page without permission..

2019-11-12 18:03:57 UTC  

Imagine donating to a party that wants to take more of your money

2019-11-12 18:03:57 UTC  

> The information could be accessed using any web browser and without security checks.
I bet they LITERALLY went to the URL: Labour.co.uk/donors

2019-11-12 18:04:09 UTC  

nathan, you said you're studying this stuff. bet that's why you're so paranoid <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

2019-11-12 18:04:14 UTC  

you know what's going on

2019-11-12 18:04:20 UTC  

😉

2019-11-12 18:04:22 UTC  

like Snowden

2019-11-12 18:04:39 UTC  

There's a reason I have so many privacy plugins, there's a reason I'm not using Windows and there's a reason I'm always using a VPN