Leaver

He would force the Tories into a pact, where he could push a harder Brexit

If the pact doesn't occur, then the default position is no-deal.

he seems to have maybe done some behind the scenes dealings

not sure

and how would boris be held to account anyway

if he reneged on said dealings

Though this does depend on if there's a leave majority

He would threaten to collapse the coalition if Boris didn't concede @Crafty

Minority government, back to square one

With no-deal as the default option

you mean if BP had MP's

Yes, which they would have more of, if they ran in the election against everyone

Giving him more leverage in parliament

yeah fair point but electoral calculus put them on 0 seats

idk

i'd tend to agree if they actually had a chance to get a good number of seats

something like the libdems have/will have

What I would have done in his position:
Run in every constituency
Forced a pact with Boris, if he declines, then fuck him in parliament
Run down the clock and force a no-deal

Farage needs maximum seats, to gain as much leverage as possible. My plan only backfires if Labour joins with the Lib Dems in a coalition to gain a majority.

This whole mess the remainers caused makes us Americans seem a whole lot more organized and efficient in comparison

This is a mess caused by the Tories, not remainers

The Tories brought in the Fixed Term Parliaments act, which meant that the remainers could do what they did

Poor Tory planning forced this position

Tories remainers I don’t see a difference at this point

well you guys don't even keep up the pretence of having a third party option

better not get into US_Pol or Jack will start reeeeing though

Yeah the libertarians and other parties on election night get their numbers put in the bottom corner of the tv screen and it is forbidden for the news people to mention them.

https://twitter.com/MattCartoonist/status/1194315930223943684

@Nathan James 123 remember how google were going to restrict adblocking extensions in chrome?

I remember hearing something about it a while ago

What happened to that?

yeah, same

it's happening

now

Imagine being a part of the Google botnet

KEK

``Google has begun to implement the controversial interface changes for browser extensions. These significantly limit adblockers such as Ublock Origin, Ghostery and Adblock Plus. Google recently integrated these changes into the development version of the Chrome browser (Chrome Canary). According to Google employee Simeon Vincent, the changes are still in the alpha stage, a stable release is not expected until next year according to Google.

With the Manifesto V3 ruleset, Google is planning major modifications to its Chrome browser and the open source version Chromium. The planned abolition of the blocking function of the webRequest API, which is used by advertising and tracking blockers, is particularly controversial. In the future, extensions will only be able to read browser requests, but not block, modify or redirect them.

As an alternative, the declarativeNetRequest API is to be introduced, in which the browser itself carries out the filtering - which, however, is limited to 150,000 elements. This is sufficient for the widespread Easylist filter list, but not for a combination of several extensive filter lists, such as is possible with Ublock Origin. Google only raised this restriction in June after protests, before that it was between 30,000 and 40,000 elements.``

So not only are the greedy scum selling your data for maximum profit, they want MORE and are now forcing ads down your throat

And people wonder why I'm against unrestricted capitalism <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

They're all greedy vermin.