Message from @Nathan James 123
Discord ID: 644676882620612639
£75 pm is the same as Virgin over coax which was awful
They're going to make a valuable investment even more valuable
Oh god yeah it's shit @notaglobe
Virgin (ntl) could never manage their network
It was always down
They run it FAR too hot
They act like it's not down all the time
The single threat performance is usually about 50% of the speeds you pay for
It's not down, just heavily bottlenecked 😉
GREAT NEWS
Hahahahah
Ahahaha
Fucking IPoverCoax
It's a hack to get internet around your house over coax and they rolled it out as an actual delivery method
Honestly, I can't wait for full-scale full fibre, but it's a little worrying at the same time
Mad cunts
Better for the consummer, but much more of a security risk
@Nathan James 123 dunno if we will get there at full speeds
Meaning, larger DDOS attacks
More bandwidth in the networks means bigger holes to swallow the DDOS
Its literally cloud flares method
if it means more downtime for labour's website i'm all for it
HAHAHAHA
She is fit
True there is that, but it means the attacks will scale with it :/
@Nathan James 123 as a % of bandwidth I think it'll just stay proportional
Ah yeah, you're probably right
As more bandwidth comes online more cables will be laid across the ocean
And new methods will be developed
Wouldn't get to caught up on it
Tech moves very fast
If shes not a commie I want to bang
Honestly I think Labours scheme might be okay
Not sure about the "free" aspect though
It won't, it'll be fucking terrible
But taking the intrastructure into public ownership will be a good thing
My dad told me labour will never do anything well
Ask anyone over the age of 60 about how well the Labour government ran the GPO which ran telecoms back in the day