remember when everyone laughed at greens for pledging £100bn per year to climate change

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2019-50428044

b r u h

at least its over 5 years and not per year i guess

@PureEvilPie my most natural guess would be something like "because it's an upgrade from the NHS"

but i don't think that's a good answer

comparing the UK to the US in almost anyway is mostly a false dichotomy

wladfa

American healthcare isn't even better than the UK

yes

But the point is, they are almost entirely run by insurance

https://i.imgur.com/6bjHg8E.png

but their insurance is expensive

slow

i was comparing the us health care to our nhs

and doesnt even cover everytthing

not saying that it's like our private health care

that's why i said it was a false dichotomy

But our NHS in terms of qualiy

is as good

because i'm not sure that it's fair to compare

It's just got wait times

yes, which is why it's a false dichotomy

Im not sure

because it's stupid to even try to compare

you know what the word means

i think anyway

false dichotomy?

Yea

Because you can compare healthcare systems

because that's what the world does, it compares their systems

there are many consistent metrics that you can compare across

price, qualified personnel

ok pep

wait times

it's easily comparable

ok pep

@Nathan James 123

I was reading into the broadband stuff

I think you have a point actually

Most of the infrastructure appears to have been built and subsidised by the tax payers