Message from @bobthebuilder69

Discord ID: 645363269762154507


2019-11-16 20:40:45 UTC  

We shouldn't just have rules that the people can never change under any circumstances

2019-11-16 20:40:46 UTC  

No such thing as a right

2019-11-16 20:40:55 UTC  

Yes there is lmao

2019-11-16 20:40:57 UTC  

That's retarded hunter

2019-11-16 20:40:57 UTC  

Even the US constitution allows amendments

2019-11-16 20:41:15 UTC  

It is an absurd system to just have rules that no one can ever change

2019-11-16 20:41:17 UTC  

A right is just a majority agreed priviledge that should always be upheld

2019-11-16 20:41:21 UTC  

Just because people take your rights away doesn’t make them not a right

2019-11-16 20:41:29 UTC  

Yes it does

2019-11-16 20:41:40 UTC  

If there was no government, free speech would exist, so that’s a natural right

2019-11-16 20:41:44 UTC  

Rights are a completely fictions invention by us

2019-11-16 20:41:50 UTC  

We made them and we can take them away

2019-11-16 20:41:56 UTC  

If there was no government, free healthcare wouldn’t exist so that’s not a right

2019-11-16 20:41:58 UTC  

See what I mean

2019-11-16 20:42:19 UTC  

right to bear arms is the same actually

2019-11-16 20:42:29 UTC  

We currently extend a right to free speech for instance but if enough people voted for a party that opposed free speech then free speech would no longer be a right because the people voted to get rid of it

2019-11-16 20:42:44 UTC  

We already don’t have free speech

2019-11-16 20:42:57 UTC  

> rights n. 1) plural of right, which is the collection of entitlements which a person may have and which are protected by the government and the courts, or under an agreement.
Something which can be broken and taken away.

2019-11-16 20:43:01 UTC  

Thus it is a privilege.

2019-11-16 20:43:13 UTC  

You have the privilege to bear arms.

2019-11-16 20:43:13 UTC  

No actually read it

2019-11-16 20:43:17 UTC  

The privilege to free speech.

2019-11-16 20:43:27 UTC  

Rights are protected by the government , not given

2019-11-16 20:43:31 UTC  

actually read it ffs

2019-11-16 20:43:40 UTC  

> person may have and which are protected by the government and the courts, or under an agreement
Then when the government stops 'protecting' it?

2019-11-16 20:43:50 UTC  

When the government says that's no longer true?

2019-11-16 20:43:54 UTC  

Then it’s an authoritarian government

2019-11-16 20:43:57 UTC  

A right is a freedom we agree people should have, If people no longer agree that people should have that freedom then it ceases to be a right

2019-11-16 20:43:58 UTC  

Then it’s revolution time

2019-11-16 20:43:58 UTC  

Then it's not a right.

2019-11-16 20:43:59 UTC  

#

2019-11-16 20:44:01 UTC  

Then it's a privilege.

2019-11-16 20:44:23 UTC  

Good lord.

2019-11-16 20:44:26 UTC  

How is it in anyway authoritarian to grant the people more power over their laws?

2019-11-16 20:44:48 UTC  

Because muh burka of course

2019-11-16 20:44:51 UTC  

Surely it is much more authoritarian to tell the people that the Government has set some laws that can never be changed ever.

2019-11-16 20:44:53 UTC  

Rights make sure people are allowed to do basic things or not have them done to them

2019-11-16 20:45:03 UTC  

In some circumstances mob rule is authoritarian, by your logic the nazi party wasn’t authoritarian because that was voted in.


lol you used the definition of rights, to argue why rights don’t exist

2019-11-16 20:45:17 UTC  

Until the government says they're no longer a thing @Burly Bong

2019-11-16 20:45:23 UTC  

Then your "rights" dissapear

2019-11-16 20:45:30 UTC  

And you realise they were simply privileges.