Message from @Monstrous Moonshine

Discord ID: 644654549940043824


2019-11-14 21:43:17 UTC  

Malnutrition is the only environmental factor that can seriously change IQ

2019-11-14 21:43:17 UTC  

omg

2019-11-14 21:43:21 UTC  

IQ rise is hollow for g

2019-11-14 21:43:38 UTC  

IQ rise due to Flynn Effect that is

2019-11-14 21:43:41 UTC  

Which makes our studies a lot more difficult

2019-11-14 21:43:43 UTC  

Full belly = less malnutrition = more healthy = higher IQ = promotion of good genes

2019-11-14 21:44:09 UTC  

It isn't race, its skin colour
~~completely different, I know~~

2019-11-14 21:44:13 UTC  

It rises temporarily with national wealth and socialist policies. The dumb outbreed the rich, and when the welfare system collapses eventually, you have genetically low IQ populace, and you've lost the wealth that boosted IQ temporarily via food nutrients.

2019-11-14 21:44:24 UTC  

This is long-term going to wreak havoc.

2019-11-14 21:44:40 UTC  

If we encourage the poor to outbreed the rich.

2019-11-14 21:44:47 UTC  

The gains by Flynn Effect on IQ are mostly on the less heritable sub tests

2019-11-14 21:45:25 UTC  

Holy fuck

2019-11-14 21:45:47 UTC  

Are you preaching to the choir or something

2019-11-14 21:45:53 UTC  

No one said IQ isn't largely heritable

2019-11-14 21:46:26 UTC  

My argument is a 100 years ago people were a lot dumber than now

2019-11-14 21:46:29 UTC  

And it's not because of genetics

2019-11-14 21:46:39 UTC  

It's because of bad health

2019-11-14 21:46:54 UTC  

Malnutrition mostly

2019-11-14 21:47:01 UTC  

Are you preaching to the choir?

2019-11-14 21:47:08 UTC  

Yeah, they were. But I don't think IQ will continue to rise any further here in the west.

2019-11-14 21:47:12 UTC  

\> says low iq is based on malnutrition

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/633967335614447636/644654589366501414/unknown.png

2019-11-14 21:47:15 UTC  

No I'm not, because above the argument was (not from you) that people were smarter in 1914

2019-11-14 21:47:24 UTC  

Which is the opposite of the truth

2019-11-14 21:48:04 UTC  

low IQ is mostly about genes, but it's also about nutrition

2019-11-14 21:48:07 UTC  

And a few other things

2019-11-14 21:48:17 UTC  

The impact of nutrition is pretty huge

2019-11-14 21:49:00 UTC  

Also, better nutrition causes better genes

2019-11-14 21:49:05 UTC  

So we should keep Kim in charge otherwise the hyperintelligent north koreans will take over the world in by subversive means?

2019-11-14 21:49:20 UTC  

Perhaps <:Veemote:501103628883591188>

2019-11-14 21:49:24 UTC  

A better way to formulate Snake's argument would be that Mutational Load played a negative part in driving IQ scores, which might've been offset by the gains due to Flynn Effect

2019-11-14 21:49:32 UTC  

@ETBrooD They probably had genes that supported high IQ better in 1914, even if our superior nutrition makes us have superior IQ.

2019-11-14 21:49:41 UTC  

No, the genes didn't change at all

2019-11-14 21:49:42 UTC  

Imagine losing what we gained since 1914.

2019-11-14 21:50:01 UTC  

@ETBrooD Why? The poor have more babies? How cannot that change the genes?

2019-11-14 21:50:06 UTC  

omg

2019-11-14 21:50:14 UTC  

How is it possible, if you acknowledge inheritability of IQ?

2019-11-14 21:50:15 UTC  

Mutational Load did occur

2019-11-14 21:50:29 UTC  

Fuck your Mutational Load and Spiteful Mutants.