Message from @spooky ducc

Discord ID: 646107358883348513


2019-11-18 21:57:12 UTC  

You've hit the disconnect again

2019-11-18 21:57:29 UTC  

I disagree

2019-11-18 21:57:40 UTC  

...that's the point of calling it a disconnect.

2019-11-18 21:57:50 UTC  

Tolerance and acceptance are different, not synonymous

2019-11-18 21:57:55 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/633967335614447636/646106840479825941/f_001da6.jpg

2019-11-18 21:58:06 UTC  

They do not go hand-in-hand

2019-11-18 21:58:12 UTC  

Hyper is over the limit clearly, arbitrarily we can but I mean we should defer to NAP

2019-11-18 21:58:24 UTC  

Oh Christ on a trike.

2019-11-18 21:58:33 UTC  

1. Fucking don't.

2019-11-18 21:58:42 UTC  

2. Non-Aggression principle is irrelevant to this discussion

2019-11-18 21:58:47 UTC  

Oh boy, an idealist

2019-11-18 21:58:53 UTC  

Not even an idealist.

2019-11-18 21:58:56 UTC  

I'm an idealist

2019-11-18 21:59:03 UTC  

And I don't believe in that tripe

2019-11-18 21:59:10 UTC  

I'm not a lolbert

2019-11-18 21:59:15 UTC  

<:randylDad:521892982576906240>

2019-11-18 21:59:21 UTC  

I'm sorry if you feel distressed, I hope you look at it rather like mental gymnastics

2019-11-18 21:59:35 UTC  

Discovering ideas

2019-11-18 21:59:39 UTC  

That's exactly how we're viewing it and that's why we disrespect your position

2019-11-18 21:59:42 UTC  

Mental gymnastics.

2019-11-18 21:59:58 UTC  

...Mental gymnastics is not for discovering ideas.

2019-11-18 22:00:10 UTC  

It's for avoiding consequentials.

2019-11-18 22:00:12 UTC  

Well, let's get back to the previous point rather.

2019-11-18 22:00:20 UTC  

Mental gymnastics? I feel chuffed about them

2019-11-18 22:00:30 UTC  

Now which definition of chuffed am I using?

2019-11-18 22:00:36 UTC  

Mental gymnastics

2019-11-18 22:00:43 UTC  

<:Veemote:501103628883591188>

2019-11-18 22:01:18 UTC  

You can only infer

2019-11-18 22:01:34 UTC  

This is basically what the argument is like

2019-11-18 22:01:42 UTC  

We all agreed, that acceptance and tolerance were different entities and that you people would like to redefine and get to hypertolerance. Am I following?

2019-11-18 22:01:55 UTC  

>entities

2019-11-18 22:01:57 UTC  

not entities

2019-11-18 22:02:09 UTC  

But I'm trying to use hypertolerance to make our language precise.

2019-11-18 22:02:17 UTC  

Separate characters, one's not a virtue

2019-11-18 22:02:26 UTC  

None of the above are *virtues*

2019-11-18 22:02:29 UTC  

Okay, okay

2019-11-18 22:02:36 UTC  

Go on

2019-11-18 22:02:39 UTC  

You're clearly having trouble with the basics.

2019-11-18 22:02:52 UTC  

So I'm going to lay them back down straight for you

2019-11-18 22:03:04 UTC  

Much appreciated

2019-11-18 22:06:05 UTC  

1. We begin with the assessment that Tolerance and Apathy are perceived falsely as virtuous by a morally perverse and structurally crumbling society.
2. The assessment defines tolerance as a false-virtue pertaining to the tendency for the morally perverse to rationalize and otherwise permit poor behaviors instead of rebuking them and correcting them towards virtuous behaviors. Tolerance as a false-virtue is the absence of objective moral standard, in deference to a nebulous subjectivity.
3. The assessment does not define tolerance as the act of giving due respect to persons.