Message from @whiic
Discord ID: 645090543612723201
Groypers don't understand optics.
They are still 4chan drawn out to IRL.
And they don't understand IRL.
And if Trump can't get it done, it's probably not possible. The Dems have the house and the Republican establishment isn't in favor of such extreme measures
The best thing would be to replace the 1965 Immigration Act with 1790 Naturalization Act
Like I said, the people will feel like they aren’t being heard
And they’ll react accordingly
@lungfish But those aren't **racial** or **identitarian** policies, unless you name drop stuff like "1965 Immigration Act" or "1790 Naturalization Act".
You need to be identitarian like Fuentes, because you need to make sure **EVERYBODY** knows it's only about race and nothing else.
You could be anti-immigration and pretend it's for working class. But that's not rightwing, so you need to be racial identitarian, and make it a nazi sperg issue in eyes of the public.
Because fuck optics, I'm going in.
It's the 4chan mentality.
What?
What what? Are you a retard?
Fuentes has been criticized for being too focused on optics you brain-dead negroid @whiic
I was just making the statement that "At the end of the day you'd have to get way more restrictive on immigration law, much tougher border security, many more deportations" is not racist.
@Monstrous Moonshine By whom?
Criticized by wignats one presumes. Which there is no shortage of on the internet
By almost everyone on the Dissident Right @whiic
Oh good book on that is actually by the left wing before they turnt retard mode. Look up a book called “we wanted workers” every immigrant **costs** 120k dollars
Too focused on optics? The only people who would think that Fuentes is too politically correct are the Sturmgeist1488 people.
Even by non wignats
So having millions of immigrants is like having another military budget
And "nazis don't exist" blaa blaa blaabedi blaa.
I just don't care when Skullfuck88 starts to sperg out if he's "a real nazi".
Watch JF's video on that, he brings up good points
Meh we have economic arguments
Which come from the left during the 80’s
Who were pro working class
The WN philosophy, much like the Islamic extremist philosophy, is that if it gets out there in the public enough that people will "wake up". Well the problem is it got out there, it *is* out there, and people don't like it
Which was brought up during the groyper war
People know about the USS Liberty, but it hasn't changed their fundamental moral values. They know about demographic change, but again, they aren't willing to resort to violence to solve the problem
The WN philosophy is to break the conditioning
Gay Marriage was detested by most just 10 years ago
Yet the left was successful in pushing it to the mainstream
We don’t support violence
What we want is a place where we are the majority demographic
Ad populum is a fallacy