Wanting to whore away your country to a foreign power is not a moderate position @lungfish

Their one of the biggest lobbies in America

It’s not been a fair equal relationship @lungfish

It really hasnt

Who really cares about Israel anyway? WNs should be focusing on demographic change and Texas flipping blue, and also the injustices we see in the UK and Europe that most Americans don't know about

I agree

But tbh, not much can be done about demographic change

We’ve talked enough about Israel

Addressing demographic shift via other means than border control and cutting down of legal immigration from Mexico is also a suicide issue to bring up.

Because when else would you do if a minority out-breeds the white? Kill them?

Redraw the borders?

You could cut welfare checks, which would not be a racist policy, but would cut mostly on black breeding.

Yeah you’ll have a large percentage of the population that is republican and they can’t have their voice heard at all

You’re gonna get a civil war

Which might not even be about race

But if you left it up to the spergs, they would bring up the word "race" as they proposed cutting down social security, and get pilloried in media for it. **Because they are too autistic to avoid bringing up their racial motivations. They just cannot be policy only.**

Just red vs blue

At the end of the day you'd have to get way more restrictive on immigration law, much tougher border security, many more deportations... and even then you wouldn't stop the inevitable shift in American politics because of the citizens who are already here

Groypers don't understand optics.

They are still 4chan drawn out to IRL.

And they don't understand IRL.

And if Trump can't get it done, it's probably not possible. The Dems have the house and the Republican establishment isn't in favor of such extreme measures

The best thing would be to replace the 1965 Immigration Act with 1790 Naturalization Act

Like I said, the people will feel like they aren’t being heard

And they’ll react accordingly

@lungfish But those aren't **racial** or **identitarian** policies, unless you name drop stuff like "1965 Immigration Act" or "1790 Naturalization Act".

You need to be identitarian like Fuentes, because you need to make sure **EVERYBODY** knows it's only about race and nothing else.

You could be anti-immigration and pretend it's for working class. But that's not rightwing, so you need to be racial identitarian, and make it a nazi sperg issue in eyes of the public.

Because fuck optics, I'm going in.

It's the 4chan mentality.

What?

What what? Are you a retard?

Fuentes has been criticized for being too focused on optics you brain-dead negroid @whiic

I was just making the statement that "At the end of the day you'd have to get way more restrictive on immigration law, much tougher border security, many more deportations" is not racist.

@Monstrous Moonshine By whom?

Criticized by wignats one presumes. Which there is no shortage of on the internet

By almost everyone on the Dissident Right @whiic

Oh good book on that is actually by the left wing before they turnt retard mode. Look up a book called “we wanted workers” every immigrant **costs** 120k dollars

Too focused on optics? The only people who would think that Fuentes is too politically correct are the Sturmgeist1488 people.

Even by non wignats

So having millions of immigrants is like having another military budget