i dont personally care one way or another if the enemy lives or dies

i only care where we are and what we are controlling

@Zephyr Blackfish removing legs would be more efficient as it means 2 -4 would be needed to carry each out

hate isnt the opposite of love

indifference is the opposite of love

im indifferent to the enemy

And they are gone for good without death

@Kaiser Pepsi Man but you don't want to be giving the poor sod's a death-sentence; they are POW's, non-combatants.

Amputation could prove fatal.

Is breaking their knee caps and hands kind enough

If you kill POW's when it's inconvenient for you, you reinforce the enemy's will to fight and avoid capture, which could prove even more dangerous.

That would probably be quicker as well

@Kaiser Pepsi Man I guess breaking hands would suffice easily.

But a bullet through the hands would do just as well.

See legs with a hammer make it better because they have to drag them and you aren't wasting ammo

Hands is just an extra measure so they can't be shooting

I doubt you'll be capturing so many soldiers that you're worried about ammunition expenditure of one or two rounds per man.

Every round counts

Plus, you won't get tired from shooting; whereas you could, as well as fuck up the manner of breaking, with a hammer.

4 bullets per person compared to one.

Wait better idea

Big pit

Just shoot their hands dang it, one over the other, through and through.

Throw them into the pit

It would take way longer for the enemy to save them all

@Eirshy straight facts

Especially if it starts raining

They have to save the crippled pows drowning instead of attacking

@Kaiser Pepsi Man bro where are you going to get a pit from?

That's just plain sadistic

I love that cats yawn

Fucking autocorrect

Cute cat

@Eirshy Deodorant is a scam? I’m sorry what

Hmmm the pit idea would require planning

But it's definitely a good one

nah bro

dont listen to this fag

wear deoderant