In my dnd group today, the dm said he's loving it and the graphics are amazing, while one of the players said the graphics are shit

Its purely opinion

the graphics are just fine

but

what is the difference between sword and shield?

Graphics r trash and that’s a fact

Stab and bash

my main issue with the game is the characters are bad, the story was bad, the game is ridiculously short, and it's probably the easiest Pokemon game ever.

Not a matter of opinion

Art style is a matter of opinion

@excursion12 (redha, richtginger) how short?

the art style makes the graphics look worse than they really are

if you rush the game, it's about 10 hours long

if you take your time, probably around 20

huh

that's short..

for a $60 game that's awful

I've played indie games that are longer and more worth my money

If you look at pokemon red speedrunning, the no glitch modality can be very comfortably completed in under 6 hours

Even by a mediocre player

It really depends what you mean by rushing I suppose.

rushing and speedrunning are not the same thing

there are games that are normally 80 hours long that you can beat in under an hour when speedrunning

Still, under 10 hours is a reasonable completion time for Red if you "rush it"

your point is moot

Brazil bad

just... droppin that bit there

😃

Ok boomer

Ocarina of Time any percent is less than 12 minutes, and yet rushing through casually you'll beat it in like 20 hours

@excursion12 (redha, richtginger) any percent glitchless or glitch?

what do you think

Thats an important question. Glitches mean huge skips

it uses Wrong Warp

Then that is not a good comparison

speedrunning in general is not a good comparison

Its like comparing the time of SM64 0 Star speedruns with 70 star speedruns

bruh, if your game is $60, I expect a casual playthrough to be at least 60 hours

that's industry standard by this point

Depends how much replayability and post-completion stuff there is tbh