If you jerk to a cartoon child, you are a pedo

Is not Real

You're still a pedo

<:poggers:583775485620781087> New Hentai is out on hanime lads!

haha I personally cant differentiate between reality and fiction therefore YOU are the clown *smugly shits self

@A.Fulcrum Those “retards jerking it to cartoons” are violating rule 4.
If you are defending them, you are violating rule 6.

@JackH670 You keep repeating yourself, people kinda addressed that. Yes, and if you enjoy any sort of fiction with any sort of morally questionable content, you're guilty as the character of that work of fiction. I get it, hard for me to agree with you though.

Daily reminder that this is someone TPUSA supports

@Nathan James 123 sauce the links 😳

tpusa is gay af

Pedophilia: sexual attraction to children
Loli: children

Jerking to loli is pedophilia

their meltdown with the groypers was hillarious

It's really as simple as that

@SufferBuddy she's pretty strong and I can't wait to see her contribute in the showdown in the manga

shut the fuck up boomers

But they're not real @JackH670

@JackH670 Murder: killing people
Video game fragging: murder
If you play violent video games, you're guilty of murder by your logic

if you jack to a cartoon pony, does make you wanaa fuck an animals?

No you fucking idiot because murder requires a real person

Sexual attraction does not

how fats her jugs

You can't even equate that

Murder intent does not either

Daily reminder that the White Australia Policy was Australia's best Immigration policy

snuff films are art goys, why have you banned them

Murder requires a real person

You're fucking idiot, it's both just drive/emotions. It's up to people to differentiate between reality and fiction which is whole of my point.

@JackH670 It’s a rule 4 violation. Not a rule 5 violation.

Lolicon is not child pornography.

But, if you enjoy lolicon you are a pedophile.

This is an entirely false equivalency

Sexual attraction to a short person (140cm)

Not at all. You claim a drive toward fictional, idealized drawing is the same as toward real kids. I can claim the same when the drive is not based on lust but any other emotion.

there is overlap but please stop conflating defending the creation of art with defending pedophiles because you yourself are an emotional moron that cant see the big picture

If my neighbor watches Rambo, and enjoys the violence, I’m ok with that. Humans are supposed to be capable of violence.

If my neighbor jacks off to lolicon, I’m not ok with that. Humans aren’t supposed to be attracted to small children.

Defending loli is defending pedophilia

And that is a violation.

Rule 6

Jack, you keep repeating your declarations but you're kinda bad at defending them, are you.

Jack's right

I'm not though, I've already demonstrated why your equivalency is wrong