I know right, Pocahontas is my new beer drinking buddy

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/09/28/views-about-whether-whites-benefit-from-societal-advantages-split-sharply-along-racial-and-partisan-lines/

Ocasio-Cortez has already had meetings with evil assholes like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton - she’s already being corrupted by the swamp

Just listened to show - very good one - liked that one call from guy that separated from crazy girlfriend

the jesse interveiw with the gamer dude was great

Sup guys

Remember the time AOC said she was gonna run train on the progressive agenda

How the gamer guy from today is definitely miserable on the inside

wait do people non ironically think jlp “owned” destiny?

Destiny owns whoever he debates because he does nothing more than clever debate tactics that don't make his arguments seem as weak.

what is a “clever debate tactic”

If you don't prepare for the debate and he does, he wins.

If you don't pull the same strategies, he wins.

thats how most debates work?

why would you debate something you dont know about?

From what I've seen, his gish galloping.

"I just listed 3 things and you cannot respond to every single point? Ha, I win!"

but he tells the people he debates to interrupt him if they disagree on a certain point

Most of what he did was just saying “ok” and chuckle didn’t really stand up for his position how weak

*most* debates are not the most intellectual debates.

To prepare for a debate is to have studies on hand and arguments pre-written. You can be an expert on the topic and not have that prepared.

well

if you’re an expert on a topic

you would be able to defend you standpoint

prettu easily

without having pre written arguments

*Especially* with Destiny being the type to demand you source an argument he doesn't like but never starts an argument with "According to Name (Year),..."

when does he do this?

It's completely unreasonable to have every fact you know be easily sourced.

okay again

when does he do this?

His debate with Naked Ape is the one I watched all the way through, even his autistic stream after it where he debates Ape after Ape already got kicked.

so if someone makes an outlandish statement, its wrong for someone to ask for proof?

What is an "outlandish statement" to you? It's completely subjective.

to say the earth is flat is an outlandish statement i would say

My field of study has 101-level shit be considered "outlandish" to normies just because it's non-PC.

i think thats something most people can agree on

what’s your field of study

But the main point is that in a debate, it simply cannot be one person supplying all the "sources" to their arguments.

Race Politics.

and what in that field of study is outlandish to normies