pancake theory is how implosions work

The first letter of every tweet Representative Paul Gosar made about the impeachment trials in order spells "Epstein didn't kill himself"

in come the epstein trolls

happens every time

no, that is incorrect; an implosing a sequenced detonation starting which detonates the lower layer out of the way using the top mass to contain the debris

that isn't 'pancake theory' which suggests that the collapse of the higher levels CAUSE the collapse of the lower levels

ah I thought it meant that the structure was intentionally weakened

jimjordon2020

9/11 was a false flag but does it really matter? We arent going back to pre Patriot Act days so im always curious why people still debate it. I guess its like JFK assassination or any other good mystery. People cant let go

because it brings out the watchers

and I want information from them

I don’t think 9/11 was an inside job

nah, they suggest that a single floor or set of floors at the 74 level contained enough inertia that wheen it impacted the lower levels, collpased not just the fascade but consumed the support structure as well

Eh? The watchers?

an organization I would set up if in their positions

He's got my vote

@Ethreen42 Those are out of order

But hilarious

@D Two Hands, my response to that statment is that the conclusion is less important than the ability to utilitize evidence to make a definitative evaluation of what occured

MA any thoughts on the thermite cutting explanation? Those 45 degree angles are awfully strange

yeah, those aren't natural occurances

@D Two Hands Wasn't enough thermite residue

Fair point. Its a solid exercise in deductive skill and thats always good

There was enough in line with the materials of the drywall that would be similar though.

One reason someone might conclude that, but the simpler explanation makes way more sense.

the 45 degree angles only indicate SOME type of controled demolition

what they used is rather irrelevant

A freak thermite-esque reaction doesn't cut like thay though, it would leave holes not angles

Many things can be true at once:
Bin Laden organized and perpetrated 9/11
9/11 was not an inside job
The government is lying about 9/11
There are things we don’t know about 9/11

Thermite isn't explosive, it burns hot

All of that can be true at the same time.

@D Two Hands you are correct.

again, my personal opinion was that the buildings were rigged with a fail-safe after the '94 attack

@Scale_e You are correct.

@Scale_e and for some reason, people block you and attempt to lie about you in order to have you banned if you talk about just 1

the gov had evidence an attack MIGHT occur but no idea when

@ManAnimal this shit has been planned for a very long time

either a select few pulled the trigger knowing those precautions existed

@ManAnimal pearl harbor wasn't the first

Why a failsafe? The buildinga wouldnt have collapsed without the controlled demo so what is gained by that?

or it was a group taking advatange of an oppurtunty