Message from @Jack of Trades
Discord ID: 644334078270898195
And not nearly enough residue to demonstrate "thermite" for example.
say nothing for having a fortunate 1 in a million accident happen
TWICE
here's some cancer for you guys as a friendly reminder, have fun, buhbye
Mm, like I said - it's suspicious in general.
@Spooky Melon Okay, i'm looking forward to this
trust me, i was aboard a military vessel during the attack
in come the team
for 11 days, i was a civilan aboard an active military vessel
wonder if they'll bring you along with me this time @ManAnimal
i didn't want to accept the evidence either when i first heard someone suggest it
Yeah, that's pretty goddamn retarded and awful. Those poor children.
but them more i looked at the engineeering...
math doesn't lie
The easiest solution is, as I said, workmanship or material quality issues.
no, it isn't
that is an impossibility
*Easiest*.
@Laucivol Or, weakening a giant building from the inside might cause it to fall
You know, because heating metal decreases its modulus of elasticity
again, if the material quality were sub-par, that would result in an awkward, non-uniform collapse
one, single, example. Of a building collapsing into itself due to "structural fires and damage"
but the collapse was COMPLETELY uniform from start to finish
that doesn't 'just happen'
@ManAnimal I'm demanding an example from the agents over there
any variation in material strength would cause the fall of differnt corners of the building to vary slightl y
we've been shut off in a private server
lol
the notion of 'pancake theory' has about as much engineering validity as the moon being made of cheese
lol complete 180 to what you were saying huh
?
complete 180 to what?
pancake theory is how implosions work
The first letter of every tweet Representative Paul Gosar made about the impeachment trials in order spells "Epstein didn't kill himself"
in come the epstein trolls
happens every time
no, that is incorrect; an implosing a sequenced detonation starting which detonates the lower layer out of the way using the top mass to contain the debris
that isn't 'pancake theory' which suggests that the collapse of the higher levels CAUSE the collapse of the lower levels
ah I thought it meant that the structure was intentionally weakened
jimjordon2020