Message from @Ralin Storm
Discord ID: 645417826240299019
sure but you're asking a "what if" that also ruins what we have now
not a 'what if'; it will
without question
don't even bring it up when discussing future energy when it also effects the current system
it's a moot point
you just can't isolate the entire grid from that type of ionization
the future energy system would make things much worse if there were such an effect
if that futyre energy system involved the ionssphere
@ManAnimal there would obviously be failsafes, it's not like we're going to discuss the entire system right now
you can't build a failsafe for an inductor
problem with what if things.. is that we have no proof the something outside of our control wont come by and eliminate everything in our solar system. Just takes one rouge star or planet to ram through.. Or we hit something like a drifting black hole.
it's called a load shunt
we have no way to prevent the bubble universe from popping @ManAnimal better just end it now
that is a bit hyperbolic
so is your argument
one is a function of electrical power distribution
the other is a function of uncertainty itself
most climate change is hyperbolic .. The earth is over due for another ice age..
no let's continue with @ManAnimal 's moot point
can't change the current through an inductor instantaneously
physics
the volcanos naturally in the earth can do more damage than all of civilization if enough of them blow at once :3
again, confusing hyperbole with actual risk mitigation
risk mitigation is what drives the COSTS to prepare
all the changes youtube is making, it seems like its gonna be impossible for anyone to start a new channel on youtube
and at a certain point, such cost isn't worth it
@ManAnimal what would have to happen for the space energy
the hyperbolic example is WELL beyond that tippping point
@ShimShamWhamBam agree you-tube seems to be publisher now more than a platform
preparing the grid isn't
If the argument is for a more robust power grid I don't see why not to build one.
well, we'd have to have a means of receivng the energy, an inductive charger
i kinda wanna try what SFO and scrump where talking about and see how all these youtube fuck ups would effect a new channel
@ManAnimal which are already built
and that energy would have to be at a level that isn't harmful to people and equipment
if its wireless.. you could build Line of Sight transmition towers that go above things
only way i can see doing that is some type of relay chain which limits the distance between relay nodes
space energy is no different than nuclear, coal, renewable
we still need the infrastructure
true, a laser is also an alternative