the sun is still greatly a mystery. SWARM and SOHO have only recently began gathering detailed data

Yeah I was going off the top of my head

Heh

Meat puppet

And sun is taken into account partially
but significant parts of what sun does isn't taken into account

for all we know, the last 10k yrs has been an abnormaly calm period in regards to solar activity

additionally, consider the papers above

That too yeah. Our model of stars can't even properly explain many stars, so it could just be wrong

so the earth acts like an electric armature in which the moltan core curns creating a magnetic field. same way an electic generator works

if you take a generator and pump current rather than take current out, you have a motor; same principle only in reverse

the papers above show a strong coorelation between solar activity and eruptions/earthquakes

same prinicple, the sun's magnetic field interacts with the earth's magnetic field and 'pushes' on the earth's mechnaism/armature that creates that field

Well earth needs remodelling anyways, could use more islands

well, the interesting thing is that we assume that the 'fossil record' is always consistent

Humans contribute to climate change, just not as frequently or intensely as most people think

but if the dynamic between the earth & sun's magnetic field fluctuate AND this can effect eruptions and earthquakes?"

how reliable is that record?

Humans effect on the planet is nothing compared to a volcanic eruption

or solar activity

We are nothing but ants really

Why would that make the fossil record less reliable? At most it would indicate that it's also a solar record

Less reliable for climate change perhaps but the record itself would be about as usable

because if the sun went through any cycles which we as humans have yet to have experienced, it has the potential to cause massive volcanic and earthquake activtivty

in places, it would 'reshuffle' the stratta

Which is why historically there's been so much of that

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

you can't rule it out that there was

things in nature are rarely linear

It's pretty obvious when strata get moved at all

You can rule out it happening frequently

Lol

however, our assumptions are almost always linear

how is it pretty obvious?

They form like
____________
____________
____________
So when you get
/////////////
/////////////
/////////////
you know something's up

we wouldn't notice if a whole contintent was effected because we can only tell via comparison

You can drill to learn about the rock formation over time you know

that is based on the assumption that the layered strata is never distubed

Not really

Um you're checking to see if it *has been disturbed*

If it's at an angle ever then it has been disturbed

///////////// - 1