I'm the peak progressivist.

This is why I hate Marxists.

In what direction?

These guys don't know what progress is.

Absolute of course!

Forward and above!

No like, what is the utopia to aim for?

Btw I figured out this guy is just another centrist on the 2 and a half minute

Nothing special about him.

An universal triumvirate redistributing the goods and services amongst the people for an self-regulating economics.

Yeah, give all power to the Triumvirate!

The Triumvirate is Da Way!

No governments, no state, no patriarchy-only Triumvirate should rule

and everybody rules within it!

_and you wish to be **where** in this arrangement? _

As a forward and giving member of the communities.

All 3 of them!

No like... On a scale from prison - via peasant, citizen, commissar, general... Etc - to part of the triumvirate

Triumvirate doesn't work like that.

It's just the meeting place of the three communities and the round table where they make decisions concerning more than one of them.

No i fucking know it doesnt in your head, but use some common sense and try to imagine your own role in society under this idology

I did.

And that would make you in non-nonsense-grandiose-terms A WHAT

I have a job and am part of the economy, I practice with my weapon from time to time and am a part of the national guard and I vote for people to hold communal offices and am part of the judicial structure.

Participate in all of the 3 spheres of society and be a member of it, so it is a part of you.

Double individual-communal relationship and when one of the spheres crashes with any of the other two-we take the matter to the triumvirate and if they proceed it becomes the subject of a referendum.

The SINGLE role of the Triumvirate is to propose the questions for referenda and the constitution is written by THE people through referenda proposed by the Triumvirate, not by any dictator or government or church or even parliament!

It's how it works.

Assuming the triumvirate is also democratically ellected...
A constitutional democracy with 3 prime ministers on undefined terms.

No its not.

Actually ONLY the structural democracy part of the parliament-e.g. the people who control the judiciary are democratically elected.

The other 2 are not.

I mean plus the head of the judiciary-who is elected from the elected representatives of elected representatives of elected representatives and so on down to the common man the other two are the heads of hierarchies, thou the economy isn't "technically" a hierarchy, but it's complicated, so, lets assume it acts like one.

The triumvirate is nothing but a ROUND TABLE-a place where teh heads, or their representatives, of each of the three institutions of society can meet and propose texts for referenda.

Referenda are the only way to change the constitution and are important for other stuff like production decisions or secession or the inclusion of territories and also for declaring war.

Basically-the super important stuff is either decided by a 2 to 3 vote in the Truimvirate, or by a direct referendum amongst all able-bodied, and minded, citizens of legal age.

The triumvirate is composed of:

The head of the Judiciary responsible for law enforcement-he is chosen DIRECTLY by the people through a hierarchical system of communities of communities and so on down to the common man.

So basically he is like a prime minister but he doesn't have the authority to write the laws-there is no parliament for it, it's the constitution only who acts as a written law and everything else are discussionable clauses of clauses of the constitution.

The second one is the Chief-of-staff of the military and he acts as the supreme commander of all armed forces-in one way or the other on the territory.

It is THE ONLY purely hierarchical position a society should has and it is him who ultimately has an authority over military forces if civil unrest ensues.