Message from @[NWFLT]Leonidas Ceasar
Discord ID: 624536961717108736
nor our right wingers
Out here it is sometimes real war.
yeah š¦
They use every chance they have to settle the score.
I told you both parties have grandparents who fought in the WWII for different parties and now their heirs are like
We should give it back to them!
And the aussie was trying to be an anarchist here.
I'm really not sure what he was thinking when he decided to come for that anarchist reunion vacation
but after the murder it was like protests on both sides and both the Nazis and the anarchists used him to support their causes.
He managed to learn our language too and actually got hardcore after all this publicity and stuff.
Even now today the Nazis are gathering again in front of the court pledging to deny the parole and extend the sentence.
This is why I wondered would the Australian Nazis do something like that for a foregner killing one of their own?
I actually hope they return him back to Australia and finally get this case over with. It was too much policy actually.
I know people from both sides and can understand the situation and both him and the boy he murdered were like 20 at the time, so it was just a loss of life for me, but these fucking political idiots don't wish to let it go, neither the left, nor the right.
I really hope it would calm down after we deport him but you should know the guy has a lot of experience in policy by now.
I wonder can he do something back in Australia with such a background?
Like would the local anarchists/communists use him as a hero or something (ours surely did) or would he just disappear in the crowd?
I'm really curious how well connected are these groups across the states and continents.
We don't really have that kind of situation here. We don't have large mobs of nazis or anarchists.
maybe a few dozen in each state at most
Well, I was just asking for a different perspective.
Thank you.
no worries
I t was nice to have an aussie perspective on this.
big if true https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-pvJ00E8ZE&t=1s
If anyone has any publicly accessible links about the interview, please post them.
I can't find anything yet.
that vid made me loose some brain cells, especially the ending<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>
Whatever you say, climate forcing denier.
I love being climate forced tbh
Personally I believe that the earth goes through a curve of both hot and cold seasons. As per the ice age 10,000 years ago. Humanities industrialisation hasn't helped and has pushed the next ice age closer than it would have naturally been but we aren't purely to blame. As the ice caps melt and rainfall increases due to the lower salinity levels of the oceans I believe that over time this will lead to a lowering in global temperature, nothing major but the same as the gradual increase in temperatures that we're seeing at the moment the opposite will also hold true. Obviously there will be discrepencies due to the amount of heat the population of the world puts out through food/energy and manufacturing processes.
I could be 100% wrong but I just feel like we're excerbating a natural issue.
A couple thousand years ago, we have a drought.
Shaman says itās because we didnāt pray at the worshipping stone enough.
Shaman says he knows more than me.
Iāll take Shaman advice. Iāll go to worshipping stone.
I donāt want to go against what the shaman says. I donāt want to be a denier.
A couple hundred years ago we have little ice age.
Priest says itās because we didnāt go to church enough.
Priest says he knows more than me.
Iāll take priests advice. Iāll go to church.
I donāt want to go against what the priest says. I donāt want to be a denier.
Today the climate is changing.
Scientist says itās because we are producing too much carbon.
Scientist says he knows more than me.
Iāll take the scientists advice. Iāll stop producing carbon.
I donāt want to go against what the scientist says. I donāt want to be a denier.
this needs to be f'n pinned
Well, big difference between zero evidence and some evidence
Not exactly what I'd call a good metaphor or whatever, but certainlyinteresting food for thought
the scientists have far better tools for investigating this sort of phenomenon, i think
You donāt find it odd that the solution to literally every problem is āHey, a bit of socialism will fix that right up.ā?
No, because they're socialists. And they think the answer to everything is more socialism
Snark aside, I am willing to concede that they know more about whatās going on than I do. And the climate is slowly changing. Of course it is. It always is.
...but didnāt they say that polar bears would be extinct by now? (Their numbers are growing)
...And that both ice caps would be shrinking? (Antarctica is growing)
...And that low lying coastal areas would be under a foot of water by now? (They arenāt)
...And that Northern Scotland would have snow free winters? (Record snow fall)
Weāve had floods where theyāve said there would be droughts.
Weāve had bumper crops where they said there would be famines.
Again. They say the climate is changing.
Ok.
They say itās because of carbon weāre producing.
Ok.
...theyāve gotten a lot wrong already.
That's why I usually avoid the climate debate