But who says what is extreme?
I think the future is nuclear, so, actually *in the long term* it is better to currently support these idiots who wish to abolish carbon for the sake of Global warming.
Isn't it also extreme to sacrifice your life in exchange for the life of your children?
But you wouldn't call that a dangerous virtue
The thing is that we must open the gates for the nuclear.
@yordanyordanov no, Because they don't want nuclear either
This is why we must pressure them to choose either carbon or nuclear.
These green bullshits are just inefficient.
Pressure, how?
By letting the anti-vaccers and anti-antibioticians take its toll
I don't get it
and them use the casualties as an excuse to push nuclear forward.
...?
Well the green idiots want everything greener, right?
Not everything, no
They pick and choose, flippidyfloppidy
Whatever is the current fear of the year
They're trendsters
They do not want carbon, they do not want GMOs, they want organic and solar, right?
Yeeeeeeeah, kinda, but not really, no
I think there should be laws mandating different kinds of products and treatments, then.
For example I'm all for 2 sets of grids-one using nuclear and coal, and the other-just green.
You know that the second one would be far more expensive, right?
Of course I know that
In the same way now there are actually 2 classes of food-the organic/natural or whatever it is called and the others.
And when you go to the store you can see the difference.
In the price tag.
They don't really care about organic or whatever
They care about feel-good, whatever is the current trend
Well, make it like that-create the legislation for 2 kinds of grids just like we have 2 kinds of foods.
Most of these hispters never looked into true organic food
If they want to feel so good-well-make them PAY for it!
They wouldn't be able to tell the difference if you put it all in front of them
Out of their own pockets!
How?
I told you-create two grids-one running on coal and nuclear, the other-purely on renewables.
I'm asking you not about the logistics but the socio-politics
And if they care so much for the environment-let them PAY for it!
We can actually do it-just propose legislation which can difffer the two.
How is that going to go through?
