Message from @Nathan James 123

Discord ID: 631867782161629184


2019-10-10 14:53:05 UTC  

The aim should be to make it so the locals can replace the troops.

2019-10-10 14:53:19 UTC  

That's exactly what the British were doing in Afghanistan and it worked to great effect

2019-10-10 14:53:34 UTC  

The US started doing the same after many years and again pulled out too early.

2019-10-10 14:54:07 UTC  

We should just never go in

2019-10-10 14:54:08 UTC  

You can't just enter a place, occupy it and throw equipment around and expect it to work

2019-10-10 14:54:09 UTC  

So how long should they have stayed in Syria?

2019-10-10 14:54:31 UTC  

The Americans should have stayed in Kurdistan, not Syria for at least another 4-5 years

2019-10-10 14:54:35 UTC  

Cause locals still get frustrated that America is still around and think we can manage shit

2019-10-10 14:54:36 UTC  

There was limited troops there as is

2019-10-10 14:54:46 UTC  

No, the Kurds NEEDED the US troops.

2019-10-10 14:54:53 UTC  

Yeah

2019-10-10 14:54:55 UTC  

The US troops were the thing keeping the Turks from invading

2019-10-10 14:55:01 UTC  

As they're doing now after the US left.

2019-10-10 14:55:08 UTC  

And keeping the Russians from bombing the Kurds

2019-10-10 14:55:19 UTC  

Since they don't want to risk an international incident, killing US troops.

2019-10-10 14:55:32 UTC  

So the US troops simply being there, kept the fighting down.

2019-10-10 14:55:52 UTC  

They should have stayed until the Kurds had to power to self-defend themselves from the Turks on their Northern border.

2019-10-10 14:56:23 UTC  

Funnily enough the US fucked the Kurds by encouraging them to remove their fortifications on the Turkish border.

2019-10-10 14:56:25 UTC  

Then just left.

2019-10-10 14:56:40 UTC  

The kurds don't look like they'll ever have the power for self-defense against a bigger country like Turkey any decade soon

2019-10-10 14:56:58 UTC  

They would have, with the US backing

2019-10-10 14:57:07 UTC  

I can go into reasons as to why Kurdistan is beneficial to the US

2019-10-10 14:57:10 UTC  

If you want as well

2019-10-10 14:57:31 UTC  

Kurds are gone

2019-10-10 14:57:36 UTC  

Soon to be gone

2019-10-10 14:57:36 UTC  

You know what's even more beneficial to the US

2019-10-10 14:57:36 UTC  

Yeah

2019-10-10 14:57:40 UTC  

Not giving a shit

2019-10-10 14:57:43 UTC  

It objectively isn't @Hexidecimark

2019-10-10 14:57:56 UTC  

But I wouldn't expect you to understand that.

2019-10-10 14:58:01 UTC  

You're an isolationist afterall.

2019-10-10 14:58:04 UTC  

Maybe they should have not given a shit before they started eating

2019-10-10 14:58:09 UTC  

I already know Kurds are beneficial. It just seems America's always in that "damned if u do, damned if u don't" position

2019-10-10 14:58:21 UTC  

They aren't dammed if they kept troops there though

2019-10-10 14:58:23 UTC  

That's the thing..

2019-10-10 14:58:31 UTC  

What do you mean? @RAM II

2019-10-10 14:58:43 UTC  

The only people opposed to it are Turkey and idiot isolationists.

2019-10-10 14:58:46 UTC  

Dardanelles are also beneficial.

2019-10-10 14:59:04 UTC  

there are more reasons than just whether Kurds are useful or not

2019-10-10 14:59:04 UTC  

Turkey being an adversary (Soon to be enemy) and the isolationists being idiots

2019-10-10 14:59:24 UTC  

The Turks are gone buddy @leavethisbotnet