@Borzo why are you hating on nationalism?

dont you want to reside with negroids or something?

Strasserism is shit

Because the state is A Product of the Irreconcilability of Class Antagonisms

lol

>lol

so you think that nationalism = having a state

an Instrument for the Exploitation of the Oppressed Class

lmao

you stupid and dogmatic bro

>so you think nationalism = having a state

Nationalism simply enforces the state

>lmao

no not by definition

>you stupid and dogmatic

maybe in history sure

but not by definition

what is it with ppl

Read State and Revolution

that is just a opinion

Lmao opinions are gay

you can have nationalism with out a state

Today, the bourgeoisie and the opportunists within the labor movement concur in this doctoring of Marxism. They omit, obscure, or distort the revolutionary side of this theory, its revolutionary soul. They push to the foreground and extol what is or seems acceptable to the bourgeoisie. All the social-chauvinists are now “Marxists” (don’t laugh!). And more and more frequently German bourgeois scholars, only yesterday specialists in the annihilation of Marxism, are speaking of the “national-German” Marx, who, they claim, educated the labor unions which are so splendidly organized for the purpose of waging a predatory war!

you are so dogmatic

Can offender even read my messages

it isnt funny

shut up blocked msg

Please stop projecting

Pussy ass bitch probalby blocked me

What a pussy

we talk about nationalism and you spam about the bourg

you are dogmatic

Borzo tell offender he a lil pussy bitch faggot and more of a queer than i am

not just that ,, replying with copy paste

lol

“The state is, therefore, by no means a power forced on society from without; just as little is it ’the reality of the ethical idea’, ’the image and reality of reason’, as Hegel maintains. Rather, it is a product of society at a certain stage of development; it is the admission that this society has become entangled in an insoluble contradiction with itself, that it has split into irreconcilable antagonisms which it is powerless to dispel. But in order that these antagonisms, these classes with conflicting economic interests, might not consume themselves and society in fruitless struggle, it became necessary to have a power, seemingly standing above society, that would alleviate the conflict and keep it within the bounds of ’order’; and this power, arisen out of society but placing itself above it, and alienating itself more and more from it, is the state.” (Pp.177-78, sixth edition)

comon dude

stop being brtainlet

I'm a britainlet

Borzo

Can you do something for me