i say lol but it isnt funnuy at all that you are this stupid ,

So now droughts have nothing to do with it?

>lol you dont even know what a strawmen is

You keep using that word, I don't think it means what you think it means.

im sure you dont think it means what it means 😄

>i say lol but it isnt funnuy at all that you are this stupid ,

You were the one who literalyl said to me "YOU CANT FIND SOURCES SINCE THEY OWN ALL THE NEWS AND ONLY I KNOW THE TRUTH."

You brought the drought thing up after i called strawmen

>im sure you dont think it means what it means 😄

You do this with Garbage as well when you run out of points. Like use the same emojis

you are so lost now , lol

>You brought the drought thing up after i called strawmen

You still are not using strawman right.

i called strawmen is right, whts not right about it

But as explained Soviets had issues with droughts in the 20s and 30s, but your og point does not make sense though, that there should be no one in Russia with the bazillion of them killed.

you are dodging that you brought up the drought thing after i called strawmen ,

Unless Stalin raised and army of thralls to fight the Germans

and you are now arguming meaing

you are like 100% troll or 100% stupid

im going with both

>you are dodging that you brought up the drought thing after i called strawmen ,

You are still not understanding strawman.

>you are like 100% troll or 100% stupid

Now this IS a strawman.

no it isnt

😒

everyone who disagrees with me is a troll

you clearly dont know what starwmen is

You really do not know what a strawman is do you?

and you started to argue that i called strawmen ion the drought when i called strawmen on something else prior to mentiong droughts

> i called strawmen ion the drought

I said that you do not know what Strawman is.

My other points was mocking you on why this does not make sense which you never answer. You just spam "strawman" in hopes it sticks

Thats the only thing you uget from what i dais, like creating context and what not, and this is what you think , this is the limit of ythe understaning you have ,, in life

so you're arguing the semantics of fallacies

fascinating

no im not

unless you are talking to him

>Thats the only thing you uget from what i dais,

JFC I can't even understand this sentence.

>so you're arguing the semantics of fallacies
fascinating


Worse he learned big boy words and think they will win him cookie points.

he is trying to argue sementics of strawmen when A itdrought has been mentioned by him after i called strawmen and B he really doesnt knows what a strawmen is

im not arguing the semantics of strawmen or its meaing.

Like I said you just use strawman and hope it seems good.

i want cookie points

You don't know what strawman is.

Nor do you answer anything asked.

How am i not using strawm men right here

you tell me

Also wha did you asked r

i know what a strawmen argument is. You have shown you dont