And that stuff above was on your even other big brained comment that I still was never able to find info on, other then this obscure book that went radcent and said Hitler and the Bolsheviks were all one big Rothie plan.

>We were talking about the regime change that replaced imperial russia

No we were not.

i wanne leave because this is too stupid but im curious which thing you are going to say netxt

We were talking about how when Russia fell to civil war, how one book claimed that they hoped it would fall to choas but were pissed since it became whole under a Communist government.

We were talking about the colapse of ruyssia

Which was not part of the plan.

teh eccpnomics got changed dtratistcally to the point of starvations pluar

ppl died

whole regions starved to death

this is ecconomic colapse

and sure maybe the over all ecconomy sustained

but the local ecconomy got devastated

but talking to you about this is liek pointless

>We were talking about the colapse of ruyssia

Which did not happen. Arguably it became stronger. There was more industrialization and sling shooting it to a world power. Imperial Russia still had feudalism and one of the reasons for the civil war was the fact many Russians could not get food.

the switch between peasnt farming and collective farming caused the starvations

Which then goes to my other point that somehow Russia become a world power with other nations under its sphere of influence, and pissing off the Ameribugers, but also are somehow shit to you.

the industralization was the reason for the localized ecconomic colapse

And again, just because the ussr as a whole saustained doesnt exclused the existing local and regional ecconomic collapse

Strawmen argument

Most of the famine issues were due to droughts in the region.

That again is not a strawman.

no it was distibution issues

Strawman is when i put words in your mouth or do something like call you a nazi

in combination with bad harvests

lol you dont even know what a strawmen is

i say lol but it isnt funnuy at all that you are this stupid ,

So now droughts have nothing to do with it?

>lol you dont even know what a strawmen is

You keep using that word, I don't think it means what you think it means.

im sure you dont think it means what it means 😄

>i say lol but it isnt funnuy at all that you are this stupid ,

You were the one who literalyl said to me "YOU CANT FIND SOURCES SINCE THEY OWN ALL THE NEWS AND ONLY I KNOW THE TRUTH."

You brought the drought thing up after i called strawmen

>im sure you dont think it means what it means 😄

You do this with Garbage as well when you run out of points. Like use the same emojis

you are so lost now , lol

>You brought the drought thing up after i called strawmen

You still are not using strawman right.

i called strawmen is right, whts not right about it

But as explained Soviets had issues with droughts in the 20s and 30s, but your og point does not make sense though, that there should be no one in Russia with the bazillion of them killed.

you are dodging that you brought up the drought thing after i called strawmen ,

Unless Stalin raised and army of thralls to fight the Germans

and you are now arguming meaing

you are like 100% troll or 100% stupid

im going with both

>you are dodging that you brought up the drought thing after i called strawmen ,

You are still not understanding strawman.

>you are like 100% troll or 100% stupid

Now this IS a strawman.