The 103 males for every 100 females ratio doesn't take into account the demographics of the males and females.

Most men and women don't want to deal with multiple partners too because it's difficult.

itll cause genetic mutations for the worse. itll also cause social tensions because the ratio of men to women doesn't change. if there was a mutation in the mothers womb that caused 80 percent of children to be women than theres a case for polygamy. but because the ration dosent change you would get a radicalised set of men who woulf oppose it. essentially a Incel Militia

how will being in a relationship with more than one person cause genetic mutations

that's not how genetics works

Less genetic diversity apparently @Andem

You could Just racemix though

no im talking that most people in society would be descended from a small group of men

racing mixing wouldn't do jack shit

That damages genetic diversity ik

But as I said it's unlikely it would be very widespread

a small group is a small group wether they are black white or fucking purple

no so why support it at all

the idea is bollocks and its even more bollocks in todays world than ever

I believe that the family is an association and investment.
Partners should be free to set their terms.

One Man

One Woman

I think that a custom marriage contract that has to cover the purpose of the relationship, Key issues etc would be good.

agreed

marriage is not flexible it is set in stone. One Man One Woman nothing else

is that why jacob fucked his wife's servant

It would make all kinds of adult consensual relationships possible but most forms would be rare.

it's totally not about womb control guys I promise

healthy societies are based around theses principles. and pointing to cases thousands of years ago isn't an argument. at the time Christianity was barely a thing and the English language didn't exist

judaism was a thing though

Marriage is an association @One Fire One Nail

which is why all that shit

It can have many purposes.

is in the christian bible

no

marriage is clear cut and set in stone

if marriage is so important you would think that biblical figures would put a little more stock into it

One Man One Woman

if marriage was so fundamental, people wouldn't be able to just not do it

wait

they keep not doing it

hold on what the fuck???

Marriage is an an association and imposing specifics harms it imho.
Parties should be free to set their terms.

because im not talking about Christianity im talking about the modern world. it is unfeasible

^^^

to steve