Italian Fascists were funded by Italian industrialists too @MrReality

the thing about fascism is that it uses capitalism to destroy capitalism

hanging them with the rope that they sell us, as it were

He was.

honestly I'm looking a lot at milosevic's ideas and pan-slavic ideas

I think milosevic and karadzic had some good ideas

The main reason he went for corporatism is that he could gain trust by both working class and industrialist people.

Yes and it was coherent with the idea of the State being an organism.

nationalization and destruction of competition is incredibly anti-capitalist, read adam smith

Nationalization in my country during the ventennio mainly happened when a business failed.

fascism requires large-scale nationalization to keep anti-state forces suppressed

The control of other industries was for State interests.

because the capitalists themselves are a faction and cannot be trusted

well the people might be fully behind it

but capitalists will always be against fascism

because they value the very things that destroy nations

The nationalization of failed businesses avoided workers becoming unemployes and that gave Mussolini support @DA GOMMIE JOO

multiculturalism, globalism, etc

the destruction of culture and volk

the capitalists seek to degrade us all so that there's nothing else to rally behind

traditional values replaced by what's good for business

Society is less cohesive than people think.

People have few solid relationships

that's a capitalist idea, not a human one

It's an objective fact.

before capitalism, people naturally grouped up into large masses of similar characteristics

We give different value to people.

That is a different thing @DA GOMMIE JOO

The Truth is that society is a cluster of small collectives

And social rituals are followed only if they are functional for the purpose of cohexistence.

How many people do you have a strong relationship with ? <@545773451332419595>

They are not much, don't you think ? <@545773451332419595>

Humans always have been tribalistic

We tend to favour the kin and a few outsiders

We might make associations with others but that's it

Tribalism is Collectivism and that didn't change really

The care we have for others is often limited mainly to our kin and outsider associates.

There is a reason we give different weight to the Life of others.

Societies never have been these big and Is kept together by mostly weak connections imho

I am not talking about economic collrctivism

Social collectivism is what I am talking about