They were part of an empire most of them did not live among the white population

That's retarded

The colonies were a massive economic drain on the home countries

You can get along and disagree about certain things

France and England got rid of most of their colonies after WW2

Why would they do that if they weren't drains

I'm sure you can just find the data on this

But I don't really care since no one here is going to be convinced either way

Also Germany with no empire was able to drop Holland France and Belgium and beat England for a while

It benefited a select few elite groups

Hi I’m a vietnamese

Everything you just said is shit in your month

And as a patriotic fuck you white cunt

Fuck you

Vietnam Rule All

Drain your anus

Fucking Loli whore

based jungle chink

France and England kept the colonies because it enriched certain people

No

Not really

I thought you were a communist

pick different years if you wan

We're only going to get to the truth through the data

Everything else is speculation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_past_and_projected_GDP_(nominal)_per_capita#World_Bank_estimates_between_1960_and_1969

Hello

Post evidence that they made money from their colonies

The East India Company for example

It was privately owned

just got gulaged for posting porn in a leftist server

America came in and saved the day, this allowed or enable them to enforce policies. mainly true ecconomic leverage

The colonies in africa were to stabalize and submit the africans

which was clearly needed

the UN is drastically incvreasing the popuilation in africa with food shipments and stopping of the natural genocidal tendencies of the africcans

Note the date , this migration flow gutting countries ecconomic ability from the inside has been happing for much longer then you have heard off

@(っ◔◡◔)っ ♥ doom clit ♥ Biafra, Rwanda, Zimbabwe, Uganda, Somalia, Sudan, Central African Republic, Eritrea?