Message from @BigBro
Discord ID: 614981391138029568
do you have any sources for this supposedly lower iq?
It's pretty well documented and isn't even really contested by anyone but sure I'll post them
please do
The NYtimes will probably say some bullshit but the point is the gap exists
do these studies account for differences in cultural, environmental and socioeconomic differences between races?
Not these because that's not what you said but there are several thousands that do
okay please find those
Show me something that says it is
im sorry?
show me any source that says race differences in intelligence are enviromental
70-100%
Don't know where you draw the line
you made the claim in the first place that black people have lower iqs
the burden of proof lies on you
I've proven they have
Why do you need to control for any factors to say that they have different IQs?
because if the iqs are due to environment than genetic, then one can make the argument that it is not the black peoples fault for the worst outcomes when interacting with police
The testing shows they do whether it's genetic or not is a different discussion
no its not
and you know it
Show me anything that says on average blacks and asian and whites and latinos don't have average IQ differences
@Cantwell
Does IQ even matter lmao
Yes
why
It's the most stastically powerful construct in all of social science
what does IQ represent, and why does the flynn effect here doesn't apply here, how has IQ been influential in the past
It predicts everything to some degree in terms of income and life outcomes
you say it's "statistically powerful" in a field full of anti-empirical analysis
kind of funny you using that vapid argument
it isn't a empirical analysis, or even a statistical one as it has never been actually 100% fully correlated to a static body of data
it's why IQ so flawed as "STATISTICAL" analysis
it's a possible "measurement" not a way to analyze a group
What are you saying about the flynn effect?
@Cantwell it represents it's anti-empirical state.
it can't and isn't directly analyzing a static body of data *ever* and is never able to analyze it with other factors *ever*