Still free speech

So they had hate speech laws

Which you're proposing to prevent the nazis

At what point does it become not free speech

At what percentage of hate speech laws does it become not free speech

You cannot accurately define it so the distinction does not exist.

🤔

things that aren't calls to violence or illegal

actually pretty easy to define

They were made illegal

Also most hate speech is calls to violence in the first place

Or dogwhistling it

Then why were the laws invented when that would already be covered under existing laws

"things that aren't calls to violence or illegal"

they were illegal as I pointed out.

and calls to violence.

so why do you need hate speech laws?

to prevent violence.

or calls to it.

but that's already covered under free speech

Loopholes can be made by lawyers

In badly written constitutions

like what?

"my client did not really call for violence against jews, he merely suggested removing them from power"

dogwhistling basically

its like what you do on a daily basis

removing from power isn't a call to violence

it is a dogwhistle of it

and you fucking know it

not really

keep playing the fool mate, most hate speech is dogwhistling institutionalized violence against a marginalized group

word salad

whats a dog whislte? @Monolith @Cantwell

free speech is such a dumb prerequisite 90% of mutts don't even want free speech

https://discord.gg/j4mPt7E

@here @everyone niggers

Who defines hate speech

The second you start arresting proud boys is the day you can make an argument for tankies and jill stein to be thrown in jail. It’s s stupid slippery slope