"Appeal to motive is a pattern of argument which consists in challenging a thesis by calling into question the motives of its proposer. It can be considered as a special case of the ad hominem circumstantial argument. As such, this type of argument may be an informal fallacy."

cults, exist. shrugs

Kołakowski seems to be mostly a sophist.

i am well aware of rhetorical devices...you are however employing such is declaring i am consistently using appeak to motive...however..i am not, i am simply imploring simplicity in viewing what i am saying

3rd cousin, centralisation.

i read marx...never mentioned rothschilds once...did internet searches for the name in his works...never comes up

why's that?

you'd think he might have mentioned them at kleast once

Why is the reason important?

wtf

Whether he did or not mention, why is it significant to his theory?

yeah, kinda...int he real world

you got sold a one oared rowboat, fam...bail and swim for it

listen Karl...name and shame..or gtfo...dont matters its your 3rd cousin, bro

You keep saying that without actually addressing any particular part. You claim, well, it is centralised therefore serves to profit jews, and that Marx was related to bankers, therefore he is complicit in plotting with them through his writings.

nah...that was bakunin

tbh, my interests lay in the proposal of synthetic utopian systems as oppose to building upon natural systems...for me....the natural patterns make far more sense than synthetic ideologies

and so much less catastrophic

That's a naturalistic fallacy. It assumes that just because things are the way they are, that is best and ought to be done. Question: do you believe in science?

if you will excuse me for a few moments, whilst i get some poisons

no it isnt at all. ffs

no...i dont believe science exists..its an archaic mythology

i'm joking, right?

brb

Are you?

all i believe in is that stick up your ass cos someone tells you communism is flawed

Is science synthetic or natural?

sceince is measurement and inductive and deductive reasoning as to the natural patterns

brb

Would a society built upon the conclusions of science be synthetic or natural, in your framework?

mixed media...let me go..i'll be back soon https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MPX20niOyQ

well, i thought about it on the way to the shops and back abnd all i could deduce was that you were inadvertently talking about nuclear power, in terms of synthetic sociological foundations...is that what you meant?

😃

ex jews are often crazy...but they are always more clued in on judiasm than the average goy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vRm2XRJFSlU

It seems like you create arbitrary categories and then side with the one you like.

Marxism is scientific.

nope...its really fkng not...its POETIC

jfc...this "marxist science" caveat. just no

How is materialism poetic?

uh...how is it not?

for god's sake