Do you understand dialectical materialism?

now, if you'll excuse me, i'm going to get wasted

yes, i really do. Have you read hegel, at all?

let's just say...cut to the chase...you dont think i understand marxism

and i lol

Can the Hegelian dialectic be applied to scientific naturalism?

is there synthesis in nature?

is that video too scary or wot?

Your edgy videos don't impress me.

I know Hitler didn't gas any jews.

not tryna impress you, sparky...i'm tryna wake you up

well...they did gas a few thousand in the little red house, lets be fair

Cause and effect are distinguished by interactions.

hey, now...i though i hasd the monolpoly on inconseuential verbage here...your competing

conrad morgan never caught them at it though, those renegade waffen ss...he would have had them hung...you know conrad morgan, right?

with a K

The overall process of how matter moves and changes over time is dialectical.

look....i dont know what to tell you...Kolakowski is your man

do you mean its in a state of constant flux...cos obviously it is

if thats "dialectical" then so is pretension

because dia is concurrent with 2...and afaik matter has three fundamental states not 2

3

so how is it "dialectical"

?

like i say...you want the straight dope on marxism@s flaws...kolakowski is your man

The universe is also increasing in complexity over time.

From lower to higher stages.

Increasing in entropy as it goes.

apparently only so far...and even then, beyond the limits of human comprehension...i guess thats why we need robots...but can i ask you, cos youre a sciencehead...who actually invented science? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8SMPGWTZ4Y

face it, science is racism. totallly hate speech

It is not pretence because Marx formulated this expression through the logica of dialectics and called it Dialectical Materialism and Historical Materialism from a social point of view.

ah ok *rollseyes

you sound a little like Ernst Mandel lmao

OK, so it is called different because it is presented different. Again, please show which part is false?

Hegel or Science?

marx occluded natural patterns by co opting classical english anarchism to give the glimmer of hope in centralised banking

That's an unfounded theory.

You haven't proven anything.

hegel existed, science exists, marx existed...but marxism is not a viable proposition in the real world...nowadays the extension is that robots will prove marxism's feasibility...its a fucking pipe dream

i've proven that you are a monolithic ideologuie and thats enough

All I wanted from the beginning was you to show proofs.