The Third Position or Third Alternative is a political position that emphasizes opposition to both communism and capitalism. Advocates of Third Position politics typically present themselves as "beyond left and right", while syncretizing ideas from each end of the political spectrum, usually reactionary right-wing cultural views and radical left-wing economic views.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]
Third Positionists often seek alliances with separatists of ethnicities and races other than their own, with the goal of achieving peaceful ethnic and racial coexistence, a form of segregation emphasizing self-determination and preservation of cultural differences. They support national liberation movements in the least-developed countries, and have recently embraced environmentalism.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]

some potentially, definitably

it stems essentially, afaics, from the left wing of the national socialists that were all trounced...national bolshevism was an interpretation of it, later....but it has some chops...there's some potential in that thing, afaics

just dont mention it on leftist bureau, cos it will make angery

I've been nazbol long time ago. Marxism is far superior.

<:hmr:312055710978670592>

Nazbols and fascist look like children after Marx.

marxism is structurally flawed...the only credible existential threat to international capital, ever...is national socialism...and that ..as a theoretical construct...is not mutually inclusive with xenophobic ethnostatism

How is it flawed?

valuing a nation's integral labour over international credit loans is not evil...and it proved to succeed

it denies the breadth of intrinsic human need...also it relies on central banks in it's "mid stage before utopia"

No, fascism is the last weapon of the bourgs

It has a hard on for property rights

nah...it was the Von's that flapped at the populism of national socialism..the aristos

proudhon was drunk

@slack international finance must be crushed by Marxism.

it wont work

cooperative autarkies

that works

any one size fits all is structurally weak...it cannot withstand corruption

My English is not as good as yours, please be more specific.

any all emcompassing theory is a monolith..it falls over easily... the answer is hybridity

cooperative autarkies... what is wrong with nations? there is nothing intrinsically wrong with nations

It is based on the contradictions. What kind of monolith is this?

they are simply a demonstration..an extension of ...natural territorial boundaries which EVERY species adheres to...apart from maybe viruses

sythentic utopian constructs are only benefitting profiteers

we can see this in the world today!

it's a monolith like the one in 20001 space odessy

i dont know, man...if we could just but get islam to spread democracy worldwide or vice versa maybe everything would be okay

i'm anti nationalist...i think every land on this planet that declares itself a nation should be attacked

including but not limited to Liberia

if Africa embraced national socialism and someone explained it well..africa would not be ripped off anymore

marxism cannot do that

jmo

required reading for proponents of marxism... not only my opinion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Currents_of_Marxism

Marxism can do absolutely anything. Stalin sayed it and did it.

<:st:312054710221930508>

It just comes in waves.

Now you have some time to put powders on your asses and pray it won't return too soon.

oh dude this idiot is still here

@ballpen#5672 why don't you like him? He has meds.