We will have to wait and see. You say Fascism is greater than its fruits, I say the same for Communism.

You understand the double standard.

<:trumpW:246055765687795713>

#too large

Anyhow I'm not saying fascism is "greater than its fruits". It's much the same of the communist's desires, the difference being that fascism doesn't bother with menial matters such as attempting to bend nature to force true equality

There's an end goal but the end goal is limitless, much like the Marxist revolution

If that makes any sense

Why shouldn't man be molded into a higher form?

Of course man can, this is part of the progression of nature. Evolution is inevitable

So then if Marx predicts man will evolve in a certain way, a better way, a provides a guide to this form, Communism, what is so 'bothering' about that?

>Marx invented communism

A suggestion isn't a postulation of inevitability.

It depends on how convincing it is. Marxism is based on knowledge and objectivity. If that is not convincing to you, what can I say.

Fascism is based off of nature which is likewise

If I said "universal truth" you wouldn't understand me

Fascism is an attempt to create a society that doesn't follow the abstract but follows what works (in nature) and cycles between tools or systems economically and politically.

If Marx had lived to see the idea of fascism, in its true form especially, he would have been a fascist philosopher 100%

Of course whether or not he would have still believed one of the next steps was a collective society I couldn't say

I doubt that. When you understand Dialectical Materialism, Fascism looks like child's play. The scope is small in comparison.

Fascism is actually based around countering exactly that

That's where the gripes about abstractions really comes in, philosophically and economically

I think that is a fair statement.

>when you understand dialectical materialism

oh my god, tip that fuckin fedora m80

why does leftist political philosophy make you sound like such a faggot?

Greenpill me on why state capitalism is bad

Uh because capitalism is UNFAIR Regi!!

😡!!!

Human concpets of value must be dictated by the state, goyim

didnt you know this?

study the (((dialectic)))

@Deleted User

lolol

Equality isn't really the correct concept, people should strive for equity

you dont have the right word for what you're saying

Oh, I forgot that equality isn't sufficient.

These monkeys are proposing 'equality of outcome' in order to trick the proles into backing their social experiment.

equality, in all functional purpose, ought to be spoken as 'equality under the law'

expecting two people to be equal in any way other than how the law ought to approach them...

stupid as fuck fam