lol no

and they celebrate foreign movies

Well which vlog exactly is it

i can't link it rn im in the car going to my grandmas

but they went to the pyongyang water park

so you can try looking up that

North Korea is more sovereign than Germony

@★ Commissar Regi ★ I don't see NK shilling for Hillary, do you?

Why would they

@★ Commissar Regi ★ why would Germans do

To be a good boy

Merkel's policies coincide with hillary's

@💵 Regi Zteel 💵#2709 All other German leaders policies coincide with USA financial interest for 20 years already

In a strange way Germoney is the one getting cucked

And USA is doing fine

What an interesting partnership of a cuck nation with their owner

The argument of neolibs isn't democratizing countries, more like stealing resources

Communists could agree that they'd need to push capitalism first before socialism to develop the country, from a transition from feudalism to capitalism for example

(Mao)

but from capitalism to socialism always

otherwise is revisionist (Deng Xiaoping)

there's a letter from a trot organization that says Marx didn't have a dogmatic view of the stages; but some people talk about stages

https://www.marxists.org/history/etol/newspape/ni/vol01/no04/marx.htm

@Blebleh I think you can do both.

Socialism from the beginning or capitalism at first.

It wouldn't be a central planned economy in real time from the beginning, since it needs cybernetics

@Blebleh it can be socialist from the beginning with full nationalization and turmoil.

Some think it is a faster and better way.

What is that? @Blebleh

It's a chart from an old page, a competition between authors who took an inspiration from marxism

It's modified showing Hoxha as the winner

This was the original one

Also, who asked before... George Lucas or Gyorgy Lukacs? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Lucas https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gy%C3%B6rgy_Luk%C3%A1cs

I respect a lot Hoxha for being the last standing true fighter. But I disagree with him.

Why?

Because of some difficulties in theory. Imperialism is possible only under capitalism and USSR was socialist, more socialist than anybody else.

Khruschev was a huge traitor to the class, but it doesn't make him imperialist.

It led to the restoration of capitalism in the USSR

while keeping the image, it's social imperialism