@Firefly#9983 Thanks for that great responce. So focus of theory as well as practice.

That'd be a dozzy

2+2 = 4. This is objective.

Not if their God-Emperor says it equals 5

There's nothing specialized about an equation.

*Okay*

@Konduct Romans 2.7 it is true. Not objective.

But that decree of the God-Emperor is irrelevant to reality

There is no object.

*Fine, you're right*

>(

kek, active moderation bots

there doesn't need to be an object for a construct to be objective

>Social construct

...No

Guys, ideology is just a social contruct.

Mathematics is ideology now?

Yes

Totally what I meant.

@Konduct Romans 2.7 Yes.

But seriouslly, is it censoring the word 'nigga'?

...How is Math an ideology?

I guess not

The study of mathematics does not leave room for conjecture

Methods may vary, but the answers remain the same.

Actually not.

In the past, before we had centralised rules for the sequence of equations

sometimes, people from different nations WOULD come back with different anwsers from the same equation.

2+2=4

The international standard is now PMDAS I think

That's not all an equation is

every culture and nation in history would get that answer

if they don't, they are doctoring it's simplicity

for example, we're talking about things like: 5(3x+4)

ok i'm with you so far

@Konduct Romans 2.7 It is a restricted field of study. Somebody who studies this kind of specialized material might do it without integrating it with the laws of matter. Because of it very specialized form you do not perceive an objective reflection of the material object. Through the lens of mathematics alone objective cannot be seen.

And its not like they got it wrong, its that they have a SUBJECTIVE system for defining the PMDAS system.

So it is not objective. It is just abstract.

Highly

Say, MDPAS or something else.

There are orders of operation that are more logical, would you agree?