Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 324008554002644992
we went from podcasts to Fascism
Not related?
Well the hosts are Fascist but they talk about subjects beyond Fascism
Seems related.
Why do you find fascism too dangerous?
Too volatile. Militaristic, patriotism bordering on paranoia, always aggressive.
Certainly valid.
I see it as impossible to succeed in the long term.
They often rely on a cult of personality as well.
Therefore its excess energies are a danger to all effected.
At least Marxist have a stable vision for the future.
How so?
Monarchist revival when
Marxism resolves the contradictions in society by removing the material antagonisms in society, but for Fascism it is always perpetual struggle without end.
At least that it the theory, which is infinitely better than Fascism's total lack thereof.
Sell me Monarchism, if you can.
And the Catholic answer to the class struggle is to mediate between the two.
Fascism non-answer is to ignore it and focus on external enemies.
Class Collaboration was heavily promoted by Jose Antonio Primo De Rivera and the Falange
the perfect chat doesn't exi-
finally something decent
you interested
hello comrades
Welcome, Matt.
Hello
hello
hello.
<:st:312060486449364993> <:st:312060486449364993> <:st:312060486449364993>
hello comrade
It does bother me than Marxism and Catholicism are irreconcilable. I would have liked to enjoy both together without contractions. Nonetheless, and strangely, my studies have lead me to study both of these and see where it leads.
What is it about marxism that attracts you?
How are you all?
I'm good, how are you?
I'm well.
Speaking from Marxist-Leninism, which has been my focus, the material analysis is quite good.
The theory has been somewhat proven in practice also, which makes it scientific.
But again, they offer opposite explanations, and as of yet I am unsure how to evaluate which has more merit.
Feuerbach, for instance, whose view were later adopted by Marx and Engels, offers and explanation for Christianity from the secular, human perspective. This is good and valid, but it does not address the reason and arguments posed by Aquinas and others, which are also valid.
The two are in competition.
It is annoying but I know that once this is resolved the answer will be very concrete and I will be able to determine which I stand on politics in the future.