Antony Sutton has lots of books and videos on this

it is documented but unless mainstream history accepts it it is conspiracy theory

Ruling families of Europe

history is a vexed way to approach politics anyway since facts are not facts but interpretations--always

well it is dismissed as conspiracy but Antony Sutton is a respected researcher that worked for the government

not some alex jones, icke nonsense

david icke hahaha that guy is literally on another planet

yeah he said he was Jesus in his 20's

conspiracy nuts have taken the juice out of radical politics and channeled into garbage

disinformation agents and lunatics

now with cnn and fake news there is no need for conspiracies

it is all coming out anyway

true it has gone mainstream

you guys have seen the cnn russia thing?

Which specific thing

the one where the whole thing is proved wrong, and its all just lies

Lol. Yeah. The projectveritas videos

Rip cnn.

yeah

i heard a good explanation by the philosopher slavoj zizek for the russia thing--it was a way for the democratic party to divert attention away from the fact that Bernie Sanders garned so much support, and was the real reason the democrats lost to the republicans

And there's a video of them literally staging immigration propaganda. Muslims holding up signs of hearts and love... After a terror attack...

*sniff*

they needed a good conspiracy theory to expalin to themselves why they fucked up so bad with the working class

>When its all part and parcel but the biggest city in the world has not had a single attack

Yeah Russia is both a diversion and a way to try and keep relations tense. Russia kicked out the jew bankers. Also they are a threat to the petrodollar

It's all about the jew money

<:merchant:323550879749898242>

Hey TMONEY, whats your ideology?

Anarcho libertarian.

Like ANCAP?

Anarchy is inherently libertarian

anarcho capitalism strikes me as an odd philosophy, since it wants to hark back to an imagined time when capitalism was free

but capitalism is capitalism or it is something else

Haven't looked into that so I can't say. But my main stance is that we don't need the current body of government or elected leadership anymore. I’m defining government as a coercive entity that plunders wealth by force, and redistributes it on projects of various kinds, from infrastructure and bribing voters, to war and weapons of mass destruction.  We need to blockchain program the lawmaking system, which could eliminate corruption. Police are needed. Self interest will take care of roads etc. Public ownership pools for roads in neighbourhoods.

in fact the term is a vexed one--what does it refer to anyway?

Anarcho-capitalism is better than capitalism with a state.

Local government can choose between different kinds of police forces instead of being stuck with the default one

People can forge new ones

@Dontkillmyvibe the coercive force of the government is decided by the social contract, that the people agreed to, so we need to find out what the people want to do with the government, and whether it is accountable

if not then change is possible, but direct democracy, ie communism, is the same goal

people are too stupid to know what they want or need