Message from @Kunoichi
Discord ID: 333707363515236354
what I'm saying is, Right politics tend towards safety and conformity
Even if they use violence and appeal to non-conformists sometimes.
right politics appeal to instinct
The non conformist left wingers just want a new conformity
to instinct?
we spooked now?
>instinct
>a spook
wew
How is it not in this context.
while left politics are more able to survive harsher conditions.
Ya know, why even question it.
"Left politics" general just thrive where people are miserable because they're arsed to do shit.
But I wouldn't say left, just populist politics.
Violence in political rhetoric is usually a trait of the far-right in europe
Unless you know
revolution
Violence is used by both sides fairly often
I mean that with fascism there's a fetish with it
like in Italian fascism
where it's part of the ideology
lefties do like to pretend violence is necessary
and we do use it as justification for things
it might be a necessary thing, I think it is.
i think the important part of facism, is the fetishization of racily pure peasant farmers.
Nick land Explains this in Making it with death.
Well he goes over a bunch of important parts of facism
it isn't one thing
but the part that struck me the most was one particular line.
let me see if I can google it
4) Foster nostalgia for what is maximally bovine, inflexible, andstagnant: a line of racially pure peasants digging the same patchof earth for eternity.
that's the important part fo rme
the other bits are important too, but that's the biggest diffrence between me and a Nazi.
sexy
I'll post the rest in english theroy
I think that's just more of an important concept in eugenics if anything
Well, it's hard to imagine Nazis without Eugenics
On the other hand I'm also in favor of a form of Eugenics that is violently anti-nazi.
I want people to race mix to ensure the health of the species.
Purity is toxic. You don't want to drink bleach.
It can become a problem yeah.