I know better.

I'm telling you that

No shite.

I can read, mate.

Though, I would have to disagree.

As if you knew better, you wouldn't have said it.

There is an option to listen what your opponent is saying or to become autist and space out.

I believe I am going for the first.

Then if i tell you is just an expression - it is for you.

Calling someone an autist during devate isnt very mature.

No, it's not.

Your opinion is not that of mine.

Can you consider my opinion on my own words?

Please?

I could, though that is not what you were implying.

Thank you

"It is for you"

That would be nice of you

That is implying that you expect me to believe it is true because you said it.

Which is why I wasn't considering your opinion to be just on your words, as you were trying to force it upon me.

At least you might consider another opinion.

It is good sometimes

I believe I am, could you do so aswell?

How?

"Then if i tell you is just an expression - it is for you."

Read the last four words.

Yes, if I mean it as an expression there is no point for you to become thought police.

You didn't state that very well then.

Then I made it more clear

It sounded as if you were trying to be 'the thought police.'

Yeah, you only made it more clear now.

English is not even my second language, mate.

You are just though policing

Are you nazi?

Well I have a recommendation for you, learn to speak it correctly before debating in it.

Are you an eight year old?

Tell me, how am I 'thought policing' and/or a Nazi?

I'm just trying to say if your opponent tells you something you should appreciate it without thought police.

There are no thought police.

And I will not appreciate it if I disagree with it.

You don't seem to be appreciating my words either, follow your own advice, lad.