We proved the inital point wrong

at least the question wasn't very clear or incorrect

Can we be very clear about this?

Let's be very, very clear.

sure

Trying to talk will people is hard.

What do you want to say @Deleted User

Okay, then your turn.

Everything you said I proved wrong or explained to you @Deleted User

You just went full SJW. Why so emotional?

Either we reset and go word for word, or we disengage.

Farewell.

Aristotelian logic was debunked by Kant.

No, Critique of Pure Reason.

It is possible to come to contradictory conclusions uses Aristotelian logic.

I didn't say it was, in fact Kant explains why.

Don't make me use the line.

Neither do I.

But it cured me of religion.

>intellectualism

thats gay

Huh? How do you go from Kant to consquentialism? Right and wrong is highly problematic.

muh logical arguments

jokes on you the only anime I've ever watches is the simpsons

The fuck did I just read. I come back and the first thing I see is a gayfemboi with his anime avatar ridiculing the act of making an argument based on logic.

lol

🤔

>implying arguments are anything but mental masturbation

So what if they are?

You're here aren't you?

Sorry, but ethics is really flimsy in its basis. I would love to see how you build your consequential argument, especially, I assume how you apply it to politics. Since I've done all the work so far, now it's your turn.

honestly debates are won in the crowd, a shitty emotional argument easily beats a rational argument, why bother

Muh cynicism

Look at you

You're just above it all aren't you

Why bother with us mere mortals

I'm not a cynic, I'm just saying you have to win hearts because there aren't any minds to really win

people with minds have already made them up

You did the same thing