And i never mentions fossils, I mentioned mutations.

No, you are confused.

Your script broke.

GG.

Haha

mutations, whatever

@Deleted User materialism is not very agile. It needs dialectics to function properly. Many materialist are less agile than even some idealists.

it's not a lack of mutations what would falsify evolution

you're still wrong in either case

because you don't actually understand falsifiability yet

I know, but if mutations where show to not occur, this was discovered, it would falsify evolution.

again, you're completely confused on falsifiability

what you're saying is that a lack of mutations would leave the theory of evolution UNSUBSTANTIATED

@Firefly#9983 Hmm, I will have to think of a good way to communicate historical and dialectical materialism is a single way. Or not! When I feel like it.

that doesn't mean it would be unfalsifiable or falsifiable based on a lack of mutations

I don't think you understand evolution, then.

I understand it just fine, you just don't understand what falsifiability is

@Deleted User is hard man.

Sorry, I'm a retard, Marx is a retard, the holocaust never happened, and I want to stroke your penis.

For the evolutionary hypothesis to be falsifiable, there must exist a plausible observable condition that would prove it's existtence, which it has, thereofre the hypothesis is falsifiable

even if no evidence were found, it would simply show the hypothesis was unfounded, not that it was unfalsifiable

Marxist hypotheses on the other hand ARE unfalsifiable, because there exist no conditions for which evidence could be observed in support of their claims, owing to the fact that the hypotheses themselves are malformed and reliant on subjective conditions and definitions

i.e. pseudoscience

for example, the entirety of Marxian economic theory is predicated on the idea of "socially necessary labor time"

which is incalculable

therefore literally nothing in Marxian economic theory has any rational foundations, since the very unit of measure determining the value of work in their system is undefined and undefinable

Did someone say evolution?

again, i.e. a pseudoscience

Please, tell me more.

There is nothing more to say: if you can't calculate socially necessary labor time with any degree of precision whatsoever, then literally nothing else predicated on it as a unit of value can have any basis in objective reality

therefore it's wholly and utterly unscientific

@Mimic King#0692 ur kinda retarded

nice words

Price calculation is retarded

these kinds of guys

pretty shit

guys

we just need an ethno state

and a gaint wall

@Deleted User so essentially every hypothesis of Marxism cannot be falsified since none of their hypotheses could ever develop a replicable methodology for observing supporting evidence within an objective test case

Marxism is a subjective pseudoscience