Message from @Firefly
Discord ID: 344758374145064960
You would call hilldawg a crony capitalist.
Just because she isn't as left wing as you think she should be, doesn't mean she isn't a leftist
capitalists = rightists
Yes, and she is a crony capitalist
I was being sarcastic
that is a silly outlook
By that logic only communists are leftists
not at all
it's silly to think that by calling a horse a horse, this justifies a turtle being anything else
leftism is opposed to corporatism and capitalism. Hilldawg is a corporatist and a crony capitalist.
@Deleted User left leaning liberal is the worst enemy of left-wing tbh
That doesn't mean leftism cannot operate under capitalism
Why is this even an argument?
In the right, left wing spectrum of the US, Hillary is a leftist
You may not like her
neither does the alt right
but shes still a leftist
I would tell you to read your own books, such as Hayek's, but even then I don't think you would come to the conclusion that left-wing economics favours equality of outcome
even though that is ***contrary to capitalism***
She is definitely a leftist
she is socially progressive
that says it all
no she isn't. She holds conservative views but panders because she's a demagogue.
This was literally spammed by the alt-right on twitter as well.
If she was true to the right, she would stand as a republican candidate
but that isn't the case is it?
She is in a leftist party by the US left, right spectrum
Is she progressive? I've heard they destroyed progress in Libya
I'm sorry the American system breeds nepotism and egoist campaigns.
>implying progressives are against intervention
Party changes nothing. Drumpf was opposed to the entirety of the Republican Party and he still ran with the republican party out of necessity
@Deleted User interventions for progress or ruins?
It doesn't matter
because they go in believing it's for progress
Really?
it usually turns to ruin
>they do it for progress
they do it for US political interests.
they say it's for progress to legitimize it.