Message from @a.

Discord ID: 348178525901160458


2017-08-18 18:53:05 UTC  

But we live in a time when that is starting to be less and less true @Deleted User

2017-08-18 18:53:16 UTC  

Is that why people get butthurt over globalism

2017-08-18 18:53:26 UTC  

@Valtiel actually quite the opposite

2017-08-18 18:53:37 UTC  

@Deleted User no, it's not

2017-08-18 18:53:41 UTC  

@Valtiel we live in a time where plenty is the defacto state

2017-08-18 18:53:44 UTC  

citation needed

2017-08-18 18:53:50 UTC  

here is some of my evidence. amazon.com

2017-08-18 18:53:52 UTC  
2017-08-18 18:53:54 UTC  

the internet

2017-08-18 18:54:02 UTC  

Moore's Law

2017-08-18 18:54:44 UTC  

lol we live in a time when we not only see a growth in technological progress and the production of goods, but we live in a time where we can observe linear to exponential growth

2017-08-18 18:55:15 UTC  

Lol @Deleted User We there is no logical reason to try to stop it. Not everyone has plenty. But they are getting it.

2017-08-18 18:55:33 UTC  

Isolationism...good luck with that

2017-08-18 18:55:46 UTC  

why does everyone need to get plenty for progress to occur?

2017-08-18 18:55:51 UTC  

we don't have a 1 world voernment

2017-08-18 18:56:10 UTC  

also progress isn't plenty for all, it's more than what was had yesterday

2017-08-18 18:56:27 UTC  

even in third world countries today we see more goods and luxuries than ever before

2017-08-18 18:56:38 UTC  

are you in the US?

2017-08-18 18:56:49 UTC  

What's wrong with a 1 world Congress? Not government with laws But we live in a relatively peaceful time because we have the UN.

2017-08-18 18:56:54 UTC  

cuz i think minimum wage in the US is a prime example

2017-08-18 18:57:09 UTC  

Congrats, comrades!

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308950154222895104/348178525083402243/DHiCE-LUMAAEvVJ.png

2017-08-18 18:57:09 UTC  

It's just a facy

2017-08-18 18:57:11 UTC  

Fact

2017-08-18 18:57:14 UTC  

if it isn't a government and doesn't have law it's not useful

2017-08-18 18:57:34 UTC  

it would be completely meaningless without force

2017-08-18 18:57:41 UTC  

sort of like the 1990s UN

2017-08-18 18:58:28 UTC  

either way, imagine your minimum wage is 6 dollars US per hour. with that 1 hour you can buy more rice than you could produce in 1 hour for 6 dollars

2017-08-18 18:58:30 UTC  

>it's not useful.
The UN has been plenty useful. It's a human organization and a very young one historically. But are there any major wars happening between countries happening right now?

2017-08-18 18:58:37 UTC  

that's true, no?

2017-08-18 18:58:54 UTC  

i was referring to a time when the UN didn't have forces

2017-08-18 18:59:06 UTC  

No. Insurgency land civil wars are what killed people

2017-08-18 18:59:07 UTC  

war is part of the human condition and completely irrelevant

2017-08-18 18:59:15 UTC  

just lets focus on the concept of plenty

2017-08-18 18:59:37 UTC  

with 6 dollars per hour US you can buy more rice than you can produce in 1 hour, correct?

2017-08-18 19:00:08 UTC  

to be complete: with 6 dollars per hour US you can buy more rice than you can produce in 1 hour for the same cost. yes or no?

2017-08-18 19:00:47 UTC  

You're trying to deny this simple fact lol. We as humans, for the first time live in relatively peaceful time.

2017-08-18 19:00:59 UTC  

>war is part of the human condition.

2017-08-18 19:01:00 UTC  

K

2017-08-18 19:01:28 UTC  

relatively peaceful?

2017-08-18 19:01:36 UTC  

what's your metric for reletivity?

2017-08-18 19:01:37 UTC  

Humans are aggressive but war between a large amount of people can be negated and it has