Ah, but look at the economic growth of Pinochet

everything that allowed Chile to grow would exist under both Corporatist and NatSyn systems

the majority of the economy would remain untouched by government

only infrastructure, heavy industry, and miltary related firms are affected

even then, they are simply re-incentivized

The government is shit at doing anything

We don't need government interference at all

You repeat that

Yet autocracies and monarchies have shown that governments can be quite effective

More effective than communism, yes

But capitalism can do much better

k

just gonna ignore

the economic revivals

of germany

hungary

japan

china (post-mao)

itsly

spain

uhhh

what else

oh yeah greece under metaxas

russia

under corporatist, natsyn, or similar policies

Not good enough though

and capitalism?

what has capitalism done by its own virtue?

america, chile, and rerereviving japan

Like capitalism has found to be much better

no it hasnt

its good

but not better

#1 economy

Can natsyns do that?

No

took spain from nothing to 4th in literally a couple decades following a devastating civil war, versus america to number one in 100 years-ish

medium sized country versus very large country with huge foreign influence

its already been shown in america that private companies cant run railroads right

somehow even democratic govts are better than them

its been shown in every country thats ever gone to war that military firms have to have a level of cooperation with the govt for anything to work