Message from @Apache14
Discord ID: 348372388716740611
So, someone insecure about their race
>repeating kek
holy fuck you're making laugh
met me link you to my NatSoc server
let*
>nationalised industry
thats what fascism is
kike
>inefficient government
we're pretending to be monarchist to escape the zucc
That's pretty smart, actually.
Fascism means high national pride and cultural importance
you're literally retarded
Have you not read ANYTHING about Mussolini, Franco, or even Hitler!?
Yeah 10 of my servers disappeared
Pinochet is my man
Pinochet wasnt fascist
he was based tho
He was the best leader we have had
you need to be further redpileld
If the fascists during ww2 had a less commie economic policy they could have won
But no the commies were everywhere
they had outstanding industry that capitalism would not have provided in that short of a period of time
or atleast, as far as industrial capacity and military strength is concerned
Not really
Capitalism would provide the incentives to do it faster
They had military firms working closely with the governnent with high incentives
Instead of slow commie industry
Corporatism provided great incentives for large companies to cooperate with the govt without the disadvantages of bad govt management
most firms would be unaffected because very few firms actually need to cooperate
and german industry wasnt slow
it was among the best
soviets also had an amazing industry but that was only because stalin made it less commie
and the americans only got an amazing war economy when the govt started introducing corporatist policies to get military firms to cooperate
but the new deal also was too socialist and fucked up other thinga
Ah, but look at the economic growth of Pinochet
everything that allowed Chile to grow would exist under both Corporatist and NatSyn systems
the majority of the economy would remain untouched by government
only infrastructure, heavy industry, and miltary related firms are affected